versión On-line ISSN 1996-7489
versión impresa ISSN 0038-2353
S. Afr. j. sci. vol.111 no.5-6 Pretoria may./jun. 2015
Aljoscha SchraderI; Frank WindeII
IFaculty of Natural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
IIMine Water Research Group, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
Karstified dolomitic formations situated in the Far West Rand goldfield of the Witwatersrand Basin constitute a significant groundwater resource in semi-arid South Africa and would be of strategic importance for alleviating the increasing water stress in nearby metropolitan areas. The deep-level gold mines operating below the dolomites have suffered from large volumes of dolomitic groundwater flowing into the mine voids, rendering mining both expensive and hazardous. In order to secure safe and economical mining, the overlying dolomites were dewatered. Here we review research over 60 years, conducted in three of the four major dolomitic compartments affected by dewatering. After more than six decades of research, these aquifers are arguably the most investigated karst systems in South Africa, and possibly worldwide. The data generated are, in many respects, unique, as many measurements can never be repeated, covering stochastic events such as a major water inrush into mine workings and some of the most catastrophic sinkhole developments ever recorded. Given the potential value for improving the understanding of general and local karst hydrogeology, our main goal for this paper is to alert the scientific community to the existence of this resource of mostly unpublished data and research. A no less important aim is to support a systematic collation of these studies which are in danger of being irretrievably lost as mines increasingly close down. Ecological and economic impacts of the flooding of mines in and around Johannesburg emphasise the lack of reliable historical mine data to optimally address the matter. We provide the first comprehensive, yet not exhaustive, overview on the existing studies, briefly discussing scientific content as well as obstacles for utilising the scattered, and often non-peer reviewed, information sources.
Keywords: karst hydrogeology; dolomitic aquifers; groundwater; deep-level gold mining; dewatering; grey literature; data preservation; GIS database
The goldfield of the Far West Rand is a major deep-level mining area of South Africa, located approximately 50 km south west of Johannesburg (Figure 1). The gold-bearing reefs are covered, amongst others, by thick karstified dolomites, which host some of the largest groundwater resources in South Africa, supporting a range of high-yielding karst springs. Deep-level gold mining in the Far West Rand started in 1934 and soon affected the hydrological and hydrogeological environment.1 Mining-related impacts included the dewatering of the dolomitic aquifers that caused several karst springs to dry up (Figure 1) and the diversion of streamflow from a river into a nearly 30-km-long pipeline. The impacts of mining have not only initiated numerous water-related studies, but have also created the necessity for ongoing research to develop environmentally acceptable mine closure strategies and sustainable long-term water management options.
Given the large volumes of water involved, and their proximity to water-stressed metropolitan areas affected by increasing water scarcity,2 we believe that the systematic compilation and evaluation of existing relevant information will be crucial to understanding long-term impacts of historical mining and successfully utilising these valuable water resources in the future.
More than six decades of water-related research in the Far West Rand has generated an enormous amount of knowledge, expertise and data with great potential for developing sustainable post-mine closure strategies in the Far West Rand. The current uncontrolled rise of acidic mine water in the West, Central and East Rand regions poses severe threats to the environment, which will cause significant cost to the taxpayers. This situation illustrates the dire consequences of haphazard and unprepared mine closure, exacerbated by a lack of access to historical data and information. It is therefore imperative to prevent a similar loss of data and expertise in the Far West Rand - the largest of the remaining active goldfields of the Witwatersrand Basin. It is necessary to proactively collate all the available relevant data whilst access to underground structures is still possible and operational mining companies are still in a position to address potential gaps in order to avoid the negative consequences of closure.
Collating the large amount of knowledge proves, however, to be difficult, as much of it is spread across many role players, including the various mining companies/houses, governmental departments, municipalities, consultants and research institutions. Information held by dedicated archives and structured databases is often unavailable, whilst tracing the location of specific reports can be challenging. These difficulties are exacerbated by changes in government personnel as well as in the structure of the mining industry, which often results in existing reports and data no longer being retrievable, as is the knowledge and insight of experts who are no longer working in the field. This phenomenon is termed the 'loss of institutional memory'1, which leads to repetition of research in the best case and loss of irreplaceable unique information in the worst case.
Another obstacle to utilising the accumulated knowledge results from the fact that much of it was generated without exposure to peer review, or other methods of quality assurance. A large proportion of the literature produced over the last six decades consists of reports drafted by private consultants, government officials and technical mine personnel. Generally driven by matters affecting day-to-day operations, some urgent and case specific, these studies have in common a strong focus on practical applicability rather than scientific rigour. Moreover, many reports are of limited circulation as they are contained in internal, unpublished or confidential documents, severely limiting public access. As a consequence, whilst undoubtedly containing particularly unique data and information, many reports hardly satisfy strict scientific standards in terms of objectivity, quality assurance and referencing. The lack of proper referencing, in particular, frustrates tracing and verifying the sources of information. Dedicated sections explaining the methodology applied for generating the presented data are commonly absent. All this limits the ability of researchers to assess the reliability and quality of the data and information, thus reducing their scientific value. Consequently many reports have to be approached with caution in order to avoid compromising the quality of follow-up studies. Unfortunately this applies to the bulk of available consulting reports which often liberally use information and data from third parties without quoting the original sources.
In addition to raising awareness to these challenges, we aim here, for the first time, to provide a structured overview on the scope and extent of existing literature. To this end, each available study is allocated to one of six topical categories. Geographically, we focus predominantly on literature pertaining to the three currently dewatered groundwater compartments (Venterspost, Bank, Oberholzer) to which the overwhelming majority of studies refers.
As the number of documents concerned with hydrological issues in the Far West Rand runs into the thousands, this overview is not exhaustive. Ideally, this review should be followed by systematically archiving the available sources - preferably in digitised format to allow for collation in a single, centrally managed and searchable electronic database.
Topical categories of research in the Far West Rand
This review covers hydrogeological research in the Far West Rand from the mid-20th century, when industrial-scale deep-level mining, as well as large-scale dewatering of the dolomitic compartments, commenced to the present (2012). Excellent overviews on the course of events related to deep-level mining in the Far West Rand and associated hydrogeological impacts are provided by Swart et al.3 and Winde4. Based on these and other sources, six major research themes were identified, into which the available studies are categorised: (1) general geology of the study area, (2) groundwater-related problems faced by the mines, (3) ground instabilities and sinkholes following the dewatering, (4) hydrogeological characterisation of dolomitic compartments, (5) mining-related water quality issues and (6) closure of mines. These categories are briefly discussed, with a focus on some of the most prominent sources.
General geology of the study area
First published reports of geophysical investigations in the Far West Rand5,6 date back to the 1930s7. De Kock7 compiled those findings as well as numerous company reports from gold mines, comprehensively addressing the geology of the Far West Rand, describing the major geological formations as well as structural geological features such as the major faults and intrusive and impermeable dykes. Trending roughly north to south, the latter form the eastern and western boundary of the groundwater compartments and thus are essential for understanding the hydrogeology of the Far West Rand.
The work of De Kock7 provided the basis for later and more detailed studies of the area. Subsequent geological descriptions supplementing his work include those of Brink8, the South African Committee for Stratigraphy9, Engelbrecht10, Robb and Robb11 and McCarthy12.
Groundwater-related problems faced by the mines
In many instances, hydrological research was initiated by the ingress of large volumes of groundwater from the overlying karst aquifers into the mine void.
In 1957, a tracer test was conducted in the area at Blyvooruitzicht Goldmine in the Oberholzer Compartment (Figure 1) which aimed to determine the rate of recirculation of water pumped from the underground mine void to the surface, followed by ingress into the mine void.13 From this test, conclusions were drawn on the groundwater flow velocity as well as on the volume of groundwater stored in the dolomite and possible leakage through dykes. The consequences, practicability and economic viability of dewatering the groundwater compartments have been discussed in several unpublished reports.14-17
The most significant study on this topic was performed by the Interdepartmental Committee of Dolomitic Mine Water between 1956 and 1960 under the authority of the Minister of Water Affairs. This study thoroughly examined a range of aspects associated with the ever-increasing ingress of groundwater into the growing mine voids. The resultant 'Jordaan Final Report'18 was a compilation of findings from several detailed studies (e.g. Enslin and Kriel19) that, inter alia, also investigated environmental and economic consequences of the dewatering of the two dolomitic compartments under investigation. Many hydrological data (e.g. spring flow volumes) that appear in later studies originate from the Jordaan Report', even though the source is not indicated in many instances. Following the recommendations of the report, legal permission to dewater the Oberholzer compartment - as defined by Wolmarans20 - was granted to the Chamber of Mines by government after the 4-year investigation was concluded. Two of the three mines involved had already started this process well before the permission was granted, as two springs had already ceased to flow. 21
In 1968, a massive inrush of groundwater occurred at the West-Driefontein mine (Figure 1). The event that eventually led to the dewatering of the Bank Compartment was described in detail by Cartwright22 and Cousens and Garrett23. Valuable facts relating to inrush volumes during and prior to the event are to be found in an unpublished report from the Acting Secretary for Water Affairs.24
After official dewatering of the compartments commenced, numerous studies (see following sections) were carried out, aiming to characterise the aquifer system and adjacent geological formations, in order to respond to the various hydrogeological consequences of dewatering and resulting problems encountered during daily operations.
Ground instabilities and sinkholes following dewatering
After dewatering commenced, ground instability - in the form of subsidences and often dramatic sinkholes - rapidly developed. The consequence of lowering the water table demanded scientific attention. Early descriptions of the phenomenon exist25,26; later, the processes were described comprehensively by Brink8. Bezuidenhout and Enslin26, Kleywegt and Enslin27 and Kleywegt and Pike28 evaluated data from gravimetric surveys carried out in order to delineate high-risk areas for sinkhole formation. In accordance with the serious consequences of sinkholes for the local population and infrastructure, and the associated public and political attention given to the matter, these surveys were unprecedented in terms of their level of detail and spatial scale. The findings of these surveys indicated that the formation of sinkholes depends on specific geological and hydrological conditions relating to the depth and shape of the bedrock surface26-28, the nature and thickness of the (weathered) overburden28, the original depth of the groundwater table26-28 as well as the presence or absence of surface (stream) water26-28. Most sinkholes formed in the outcrop area of the chert-rich dolomitic formations (i.e. Monte Christo and Eccles Formations) and were often associated with fault zones, fractures and dyke edges as well as the stream bed of the Wonderfonteinspruit. Beukes29 found a possible effect of rising water tables (termed 'rewatering') on the rate at which new sinkholes develop. Swart30, Swart et al.3 and Winde and Stoch1 outlined the possible impact of sinkholes on the recharge rate of the dolomitic compartments based on historical heavy rainfall events. Although desirable in order to assess groundwater recharge of compartments under the present conditions, reliable long-term data indicating the impacts of sinkholes on recharge rates do not exist. More recent studies reviewing the history and extent of sinkhole development in the Far West Rand, without necessarily introducing new aspects or concepts, exist from De Bruyn and Bell31 and Van Niekerk and Van der Walt32. A vast quantity of unpublished data (comprising some 2500 documents) on dewatering-related ground movements from 1964 to 2007 has been assembled by the State Coordinating Technical Committee. This work was and is complemented by work at the Geobasecamp of Gold Fields Ltd. in Oberholzer, where many data relating to sinkholes and ground subsidence are captured in a dedicated geographic information system (GIS).
Hydrogeological characterisation of dolomitic compartments
The hydrogeology of the dolomitic compartments, focusing on the structural geology, groundwater storage and recharge as well as the determination of hydraulic parameters, has been assessed by a range of comprehensive and detailed studies. In an early seminal study, Enslin and Kriel19 delineated surface catchment boundaries of the dolomitic compartments and assessed monthly and annual water balances including artificial sources of recharge and discharge. Subsequent comprehensive hydrological studies exist from Brink8, Jordaan et al.18, Enslin33, Enslin and Kriel34, Fleisher35, Vegter36 and Foster37.
Martini and Kavalieris38 described the general genesis and morphology of the Transvaal dolomites, especially the caves. Processes involved in the weathering and karstification of the dolomites in the Far West Rand were described by Morgan and Brink39 who outlined three vertical zones distinguished by their degree of karstification: a highly weathered nearly porous zone followed by a cavernous zone as well as weakly fractured to solid dolomite. The hydraulic characteristics of vertical fissures in the dolomite were described by Wolmarans and Guise-Brown40 and Wolmarans41. Cross-cutting through all geological formations, these fissures transport groundwater from the dolomite into the mine voids. According to the authors, the hydraulic properties as well as the ability to conduct groundwater down to the mine voids, largely depends on the large-scale folding of the dolomite, whereas fissures in areas of synclinal folding (tension zones) generally generate more ingress water than fissures in areas of anticlinal folding (compression zones). Descriptions of the petrography, thickness and distribution, as well as the hydrology of non-dolomitic rock formations associated with the dolomitic aquifer system, can be found in De Freitas42.
Various pumping tests have been undertaken for the hydraulic characterisation of the dolomite. Schwartz and Midgley43 derived values of transmissivity and the storage coefficient of the Bank Compartment by applying the method of Theis44 to data recorded during the inrush event that flooded West-Driefontein in 1968. Fleisher35, De Freitas42 and Bredenkamp et al.45 describe further pumping tests evaluated by a range of methods. Results indicate a high heterogeneity of the dolomite with transmissivities ranging from a few hundred to several thousand metres squared per day. Geo Hydro Technologies46 conducted slug tests in the Pretoria Group rocks covering the dolomite at the southern edge of the outcrop area; values of hydraulic conductivity thus obtained were generally lower than those found in the upper dolomite.
In the pumping test analyses quoted above, as well as in those conducted in similar aquifers in South Africa (e.g. van Tonder et al.47), it was found that the determination of the storage coefficient is problematic, as values in many cases showed a so-called distance-dependency (referring to the distance between the observation and pumping well). A possible explanation for this observation was provided by Neuman (1994, personal communication quoted in Kirchner and Van Tonder48).
The (effective) porosity, which was found to decline with depth, has been assessed by Enslin and Kriel19, Enslin and Kriel34, Fleisher35 and Foster (unpublished data, quoted in Foster49). Applied methods include pumping tests as well as borehole and mine shaft log evaluation, spring flow analysis and water balance studies.
On the basis of spring flow hydrographs, groundwater recharge of compartments was described by Fleisher35 as a two-phase system with an immediate and a delayed component. The long-term average recharge volume of compartments, often quoted as percentage of rainfall, was estimated from natural spring flow volumes18, the Hill-method35 and (long-term) pumping rates of mines50,51. Bredenkamp52,53 estimated recharge in two similar dolomitic compartments using chloride profiles and a 14C model, respectively. The possibility of artificially recharging the aquifer via boreholes has been investigated by Enslin et al.54 who identified possible recharge areas on the basis of data from the gravimetric survey quoted above.
Mining-related water quality issues
Groundwater quality issues relating to the problem of acid mine drainage have been addressed.55 Pyrite, occurring in mined ore reefs, produces iron hydroxide and sulphuric acid when it comes into contact with water and oxygen. This highly toxic acidic solution may decant on the surface after flooding of abandoned mine voids. As stated by Pulles et al.56, decanting of mine water is likely to occur to some degree in the Far West Rand after mining ceases. Although the environmental threads linked to acid mine drainage were recently under discussion for other mining areas of South Africa,57 detailed studies of these aspects are largely lacking in the Far West Rand.
In a study jointly funded by the Water Research Commission and the Far West Rand Dolomitic Water Association, Dill et al.58 investigated the effects on the quality of groundwater resources of the common practice of using tailings materials for the filling of sinkholes. Dill et al.58 suggested that uranium levels of up to 300 mg/L are to be expected in leachate from such fillings. These levels indicate that tailings-filled sinkholes are a major risk for polluting groundwater.
Pollution of the environment caused by the water- and airborne transport of uranium originating to large extents from large slimes dams has been addressed by Wade et al.59, Coetzee et al.60, Winde61-63, NECSA64, Barthel65 and IWQS66. These studies report on elevated concentrations of uranium in ground- and surface water60,61,63,66,67, riverine sediments59,60,65, soil60,65, fish63,64 and livestock64. Current research focuses on the possible associated health risks, including concentrations of uranium and processes and pathways involved in the spreading of uranium. As a major issue in this regard, Winde67 pointed out the general lack of reliable scientific knowledge on long-term health effects of uranium, which is also reflected by the wide range of uranium limits for drinking water given by different organisations and countries.
Closure of mines
In recent years, as mining in the Far West Rand has passed its zenith, research has shifted towards the challenges of sustainable mine closure and associated hazards. Winde and Stoch1, Usher and Scott68 and Winde et al.69 comprehensively address the environmental impacts of mining with special reference to mine closure strategies. A report of the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry70 briefly assesses the future (post-mining) water supply potential of the dolomitic compartments. Winde and Stoch71 were the first to examine the opportunities associated with mine closure by exploring the potential of the area for beneficial post-closure use of mining residuals and infrastructure.
The water quality issues mentioned above, as well as the availability of water, will be influenced by the post-mine closure management of rewatering of the compartments. Different authors have estimated the time it will take for compartments to fill up with infiltrating groundwater once the mines stop pumping. Estimates for the period for the mine void and the dewatered compartment to re-fill range from 15 years69 to 30 years51. Usher and Scott68 estimated the time it will take for the rewatering of the dolomites (but not the mine void) from groundwater balance studies at a maximum of 30 years and from numerical modelling at 21 years (only Bank Compartment). The time estimated for the rewatering of the Gemsbokfontein West compartment was 7.5 years72 or between 5.8 and 46 years73.
The processes of rewatering may be influenced by the formation of a mega-compartment, which could result from hydraulic linking of the previously discrete groundwater compartments of the Far West Rand.18 This is likely to have serious implications for many features of the hydrological system such as spring flow, the rate of groundwater recharge and the resultant groundwater quality. Although the issue was already mentioned in the Jordaan Report18 in 1960, the matter has not yet been resolved. The existing uncertainties complicate the assessment of post-mine closure scenarios with regard to aquifer conditions and the associated environmental aspects. As a result, even in investigations into other aspects, an assumption is made about the hydrogeological future by choosing one of the two opposing scenarios58,74 (i.e. reactivation of spring flow or formation of a mega-compartment in which springs remain dry) or taking both possibilities into account70.
The mega-compartment concept has recently been subject to opposing views. The concept has been highlighted by Usher and Scott68 and Scott75, the latter proposing the possibility of preventing the formation of a mega-compartment by artificially sealing the tunnels that interconnect compartments. Investigations by Gold Fields in collaboration with the Department of Water Affairs showed that this option was not economically feasible (Stoch 2014, oral communication). The mega-compartment concept was rejected by Dill et al.58 and Swart et al.51. Whilst the mega-compartment concept has largely been addressed exclusively on a speculative basis, Swart et al.51 provided the only existing study employing a scientific methodological approach (based on Darcy's Law) in order to approach the issue on a hydraulic basis. Consequently, Van Niekerk and Van der Walt32 and Winde and Erasmus74 propose that the existing research on the topic (i.e. hydraulic consequences of piercing of dykes) is insufficient to reach any firm conclusions.
Conclusions and recommendations
The Far West Rand is a major deep-level gold mining area in South Africa and hosts significant groundwater resources. We have identified some particularities and issues related to the literature relevant to hydrological research in the Far West Rand. Related research over the past six decades has produced a large volume of literature, which is difficult to evaluate systematically owing to a lack of a coherent, central archiving facility and a marked lack of quality-assurance procedures. By subdividing the many complex and overlapping studies into six major topical categories, an overview is provided which reduces the overwhelming complexity of the collection of relevant studies to manageable proportions. The identification of relevant studies for future researchers is hereby simplified. The number of documents obtained (amounting to a total of 765 entities) is listed in each topical category discussed in this review in Figure 2.
Water quality issues related to mining is the single largest category of the six topics covered in this review with a quarter of all documents relating to this aspect (Figure 2). Next largest is the two groundwater-related aspects addressing the hydrogeological properties of dolomite and related water flow. The closure of mines ranks last in terms of the number of relevant documents, as many mines are still active. This study highlights the need to address this aspect in more detail in future. The relatively modest number of documents relating to ground stability reflects the short-term nature of scientific attention.
Once the causes of the sudden appearance of sinkholes and ground subsidence had been understood, the number of dedicated studies on this aspect decreased. However, documents relating to routine observations of ground movement by the State Coordinating Technical Committee alone are currently estimated to number 2500, which would render this aspect by far the best covered.
The fact that much hydrological knowledge is contained in unpublished documents such as internal and confidential reports of companies is a major issue that hampers the effective utilisation of available data. Furthermore, because many documents do not meet scientific standards it is often difficult to evaluate the reliability and quality of the information. However, by putting individual studies into the context of related studies, as well as through intercomparisons, this obstacle can often be overcome, allowing the use of unique and often unreproducible data and studies.
In an effort to ameliorate the problems relating to the literature describing the Far West Rand, an initiative by the Mine Water Research Group of the North-West University (Vaal Triangle Campus) is currently underway. This initiative involves the systematic compilation of all available relevant documents into a single archive approaching some 6000 hard copies. These documents are in the process of being digitised and collated in an electronic catalogue. It is envisaged that all relevant numerical data will ultimately be extracted, georeferenced and transformed into electronic formats for the subsequent incorporation into a central GIS-supported database.
We graciously thank the National Research Foundation of South Africa (grant no. 86331) for financial support.
With sadness we learned that Dr Eliezer Joshua (Leslie) Stoch passed away on 24 August 2014. As a long-term resident he was passionate about the study area and much of what is reported in this paper is based on his vast and comprehensive collection of historical documents and was inspired by his contagious enthusiasm for this unique region. We dedicate this paper to him.
A.S. drafted the first version of the article and selected the relevant literature. F.W. provided input and background knowledge to all parts of the text and helped with structuring, editing and writing of the final version.
1. Winde F, Stoch EJ. Threats and opportunities for post-closure development in dolomitic gold mining areas of the West Rand and Far West Rand (South Africa) - A hydraulic view. Part 1: Mining legacy and future threats. Water SA. 2010;36(1):69-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v36i1.50908 [ Links ]
2. United Nations Environment Programme. Geo-2000 global environmental outlook, overview. Nairobi: United Nations Environmental Programme; 1999. [ Links ]
3. Swart CJU, Stoch EJ, Van Jaarsveld CF, Brink ABA. The lower Wonderfontein Spruit: An exposé. Environ Geol. 2003;43(6):635-653. [ Links ]
4. Winde F. Karst, uranium, gold and water - Lessons from South Africa for reconciling mining activities and sustainable water use in semi-arid karst areas: A case study. In: Jones JAA, editor. Sustaining groundwater resources. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media; 2011. p. 35-53. [ Links ]
5. Krahmann R. The geophysical magnetometric investigations on the West Witwatersrand areas between Randfontein and Potchefstroom, Transvaal. Trans Geol Soc S Afr. 1936;39:1-44. [ Links ]
6. Pelletier RA. Contributions to the geology of the Far West Rand. Trans Geol Soc S Afr. 1937;40:127-162. [ Links ]
7. De Kock WP. The geology and economic significance of the West Wits Line. In: Houghton SH, editor. The geology of some ore deposits in southern Africa, volume 1. Johannesburg: Geological Society of South Africa; 1964. p. 323-386. [ Links ]
8. Brink ABA. Engineering geology of South Africa, volume. 1. Pretoria: Building Publications; 1979. [ Links ]
9. South African Committee for Stratigraphy. Stratigraphy of South Africa. Part 1. Pretoria: Department of Mineral and Energy Affairs, Geological Survey; 1980. [ Links ]
10. Engelbrecht CJ. The West Wits Line. In: Antrobus ESA, editor. Witwatersrand gold - 100 Years. Johannesburg: Geological Society of South Africa; 1986. p. 199-223. [ Links ]
11. Robb LJ, Robb VM. Gold in the Witwatersrand Basin. In: Wilson MGC, Anhaeusser CR, editors. The mineral resources of South Africa. 6th ed. Pretoria: Council for Geosciences; 1998. p. 294-349. [ Links ]
12. McCarthy TS. The Witwatersrand Supergroup. In: Johnson MR, Anhaeusser CR, Thomas RJ, editors. The geology of South Africa. Johannesburg: Geological Society of South Africa, Council for Geosciences; 2006. p. 155-186. [ Links ]
13. National Mechanical Engineering Research Institute. Water problem at West Driefontein G.M. CO. Report No 2. Pretoria: New Consolidated Gold Fields Ltd.; 1957 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
14. Enslin JF. Report on the groundwater in the mining areas of Blyvooruitzicht, West Driefontein, Doornfontein and Venterspost mines and its relation to the supplies of the Oberholzer and Venterspost loop irrigation boards. Pretoria: Geological Survey; 1954 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
15. Interdepartmental Committee on Dolomitic Water Pumped by Mines. Depletion of water stored in Oberholzer Compartment. Interdepartmental Committee on Dolomitic Water Pumped by Mines; 1958 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
16. Knight K. An estimate of the total quantity of water abstracted from the Oberholzer Dolomitic compartment up to the end of 1964, the possible rate of replacing the water and the feasibility of so doing. Rand Mines Ltd; 1964 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
17. Irving CJ. Comment on the dewatering of the Oberholzer Dolomitic Compartment. Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Co Ltd; 1964 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
18. Jordaan JM, Enslin JF, Kriel J, Havemann A, Kent LE, Cable WH. Final report of the Interdepartmental Committee on Dolomitic Mine Water: Far West Rand. Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry; 1960 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
19. Enslin JF, Kriel JP. Some results obtained from a hydrological study of a dolomitic catchment area in the Transvaal, Union of South Africa. Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs, Division of Hydrological Research; 1959. [ Links ]
20. Wolmarans JF. The least unsafe route, volume 1. Carletonville: Webb and Partners; 1982. [ Links ]
21. Stoch EJ, Winde F. Threats and opportunities for post-closure development in dolomitic gold mining areas of the West Rand and Far West Rand (South Africa) - A hydraulic view. Part 3: Planning and uncertainty - Lessons from history. Water SA. 2010;36(1):83-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v36i1.50910 [ Links ]
22. Cartwright AP. West Driefontein - Ordeal by water. Johannesburg: Gold Fields of South Africa Ltd., JG Ince & Son Ltd.; 1969. [ Links ]
23. Cousens RRM, Garrett WS. The flooding at the West Driefontein Mine. S Afr Inst Min Metall. 1969;69(9):421-463. [ Links ]
24. Acting Secretary for Water Affairs. Far West Rand: De-watering Bank Compartment: Through West Driefontein Gold Mine: Effects on farming community: Application for urgent decision re purchase of properties and/or water rights. Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs; 1968 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
26. Bezuidenhout CA, Enslin JF. Surface subsidence and sinkholes in the dolomitic areas of the Far West Rand, Transvaal, Republic of South Africa. In: Land subsidence 1969. Proceedings of the Tokyo Symposium; 1969 Sep 17-22; Tokyo, Japan. Gentbrugge: Unesco/IAHS; 1970. p. 482-495. [ Links ]
27. Kleywegt RJ, Enslin JF. The application of the gravity method to the problem of ground settlement and sinkhole formation in dolomite on the Far West Rand, South Africa. In: IAEG 1973. Proceedings of the International Association of Engineering Geologists Symposium on sinkholes and subsidence -Engineering geological problems associated with soluble rocks; 1973 Sep 10-13; Hannover, Germany. Essen: Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Erd- und Grundbau; 1973. p. 301-315. [ Links ]
28. Kleywegt RJ, Pike DR. Surface subsidence and sinkholes caused by lowering of the dolomitic water-table on the Far West Rand Gold Field of South Africa. Ann Geol Surv (S Afr). 1982;16:77-105. [ Links ]
29. Beukes JHT. Ground movement and the formation of sinkholes due to the partial rewatering of Venterspost Compartment 1975-1978. In: Geological survey (South Africa). Proceedings of the Seminar on the Engineering Geological Evaluation of Sites on Dolomite. Pretoria: Geological Survey; 1987. p. 86-95. [ Links ]
30. Swart CJU. Storm water infiltration into dewatered dolomitic compartments via sinkholes in river beds. Gold Fields Ground Stability Group. Memorandum No GF/GSG/2000/19. 2000 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
31. De Bruyn IA, Bell FG. The occurrence of sinkholes and subsidence depressions in the Far West Rand and Gauteng Province, South Africa, and their engineering implications. Environ Eng Geosci. 2001;7(3):281-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.7.3.281 [ Links ]
32. Van Niekerk HJ, Van der Walt IJ. Dewatering of the West Rand dolomitic area by gold mining activities and subsequent ground instability. Land Degrad Dev. 2006;17(4):441-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ldr.749 [ Links ]
33. Enslin JF. Dolomitic water supplies in the Transvaal, Republic of South Africa. Memoirs Internat Assoc Hydrogeol. 1967;8:433-476. [ Links ]
34. Enslin JF, Kriel JP. The assessment and possible future use of the dolomitic ground water resources of the Far West Rand, Transvaal, Republic of South Africa. In: Papers of the International Conference on Water for Peace volume 2; 1967 May 23-31; Washington DC, USA. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office; 1968. p. 908-918. [ Links ]
35. Fleisher JNE. The geohydrology of the dolomitic aquifers of the Malmani subgroup in the south-western Transvaal Republic of South Africa. DWAF Technical Report No GH 3169. Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry; 1981 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
36. Vegter JR. Dolomitic water supplies with special reference to southern and western Transvaal. DWAF Technical Report No GH 3353. Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry; 1984 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
37. Foster MBJ. The hydrogeology of dolomitic formations in the southern and western Transvaal. DWAF Technical Report No. GH 3643. Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry; 1989 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
39. Morgan DJT, Brink ABA. The Far West Rand dolomites. In: National Water Well Association, editor. Proceedings of the International Conference on Ground Water Technology; 1984 Nov 14-17; Johannesburg, South Africa. Worthington: National Water Well Association; 1984. p. 554-573. [ Links ]
40. Wolmarans JF, Guise-Brown FH. The water hazard in deep gold mining of the Far West Witwatersrand, South Africa. In: Asociacion Nacional de Ingenieros de Minas, Consejo Superior de Colegios de Ingenieras de Minas. Proceedings, World Congress on Water in Mining and Underground Works (SIAMOS-78); 1978 Sep 18-22; Granada, Spain. Granada: Asociacion Nacional De Ingenieros De Minas; 1978. p. 329-346. [ Links ]
41. Wolmarans JF. Ontwikkeling van die dolomietgebied aan die verre Wes Rand: Gebeure in perspektief [Dewatering of the dolomitic area on the Far West Rand: Events in perspective] [dissertation]. Pretoria: University of Pretoria; 1984. Afrikaans. [ Links ]
42. De Freitas MH. The effect of non-dolomitic rocks upon the flow of water in the Bank Compartment. London: Geology Department, Imperial College; 1974 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
43. Schwartz HI, Midgley DC. Evaluation of geo-hydrologic constants for the Far West Rand dolomitic formations. Civ Eng S Afr. 1975;17(2):31-36. [ Links ]
44. Theis CV. The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground-water storage. Trans Am Geophys Union. 1935;16(2):519-524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/TR016i002p00519 [ Links ]
45. Bredenkamp DB, Fayazi M, Botha LJ. Interpretation of pumping test in the Gemsbokfontein East Compartment - A typical heterogeneous karst system. DWAF Technical Report No GH 3727. Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Directorate of Geohydrology; 1991 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
46. Geo Hydro Technologies. Geohydrological investigation of the groundwater conditions at West Driefontein, a division of Driefontein Consolidated Ltd. Report No. WES\97\103. Pretoria: Geo Hydro Technologies; 1998 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
47. Van Tonder G, Bardenhagen I, Riemann K, Van Bosch J, Dzanga P Xu Y Manual on pumping test analysis in fractured-rock aquifers. WRC Report No 1116/1/02. Pretoria: Water Research Commission; 2002. [ Links ]
48. Kirchner J, Van Tonder GJ. Proposed guidelines for the execution, evaluation and interpretation of pumping tests in fractured-rock formations. Water SA. 1995;21(3):187-200. [ Links ]
49. Foster MBJ. First revision of the geohydrology of the Zuurbekom and Gemsbokfontein Compartments. DWAF Technical Report No GH 3542. Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry; 1987 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
50. Foster MBJ. The groundwater resources of the Far West Rand dolomitic compartments. DWAF Technical Report No. GH 3607. Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry; 1988 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
51. Swart CJU, James AR, Kleywegt RJ, Stoch EJ. The future of the dolomitic springs after mine closure on the Far West Rand, Gauteng, RSA. Environ Geol. 2003;44(7):751-770. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0820-3 [ Links ]
52. Bredenkamp DB. Recharge estimation based on chloride profiles. DWAF Technical Report No GH 3804. Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Directorate of Geohydrology; 1993 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
53. Bredenkamp DB. Use of natural isotopes and groundwater quality for improved recharge and flow estimates in dolomitic aquifers. Water SA. 2007;33(1):87-94. [ Links ]
54. Enslin JF, Kleywegt RJ, Buekes JHT, Gordon-Welsh JF. Artificial recharge of dolomitic ground-water compartments in the Far West Rand Gold Fields of South Africa. In: International Association of Hydrological Sciences, editor. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Land Subsidence; 1976 Dec 13-17; Anaheim, CA, USA. Ann Arbor, MI: International Association of Hydrological Sciences; 1977. p. 495-506. [ Links ]
55. Durand JF. The impact of gold mining on the Witwatersrand on the rivers and karst system of Gauteng and North West Province. J Afr Earth Sci. 2012;68:24-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2012.03.013 [ Links ]
56. Pulles W, Banister S, Van Biljon M. The development of appropriate procedures towards and after closure of underground gold mines from a water management perspective. WRC Report No 1215/01/05. Pretoria: Water Research Commission; 2005. [ Links ]
57. Winde F, Stoch EJ, Erasmus E. Desktop assessment of the risk for basement structures of buildings of Standard Bank and ABSA in Central Johannesburg to be affected by rising mine water levels in the Central Basin. Final Report (Volume I of III). Potchefstroom: Mine Water Research Group, North-West University; 2011 [unpublished report]. http://dx.doi.org/10.2747/0272-36188.8.131.523 [ Links ]
58. Dill S, Boer RH, Boshoff HJJ, James AR, Stobart BI. An Assessment of the impacts on groundwater quality associated with the backfilling of dolomitic cavities with gold mine tailings. WRC Report No 1122/1/07. Pretoria: Water Research Commission; 2007. [ Links ]
59. Wade PW, Woodborne S, Morris WM, Vos P Jarvis NV. Tier 1 risk assessment of selected radionuclides in sediments of the Mooi River catchment. WRC Report No 1095/1/02. Pretoria: Water Research Commission; 2002. [ Links ]
60. Coetzee H, Winde F, Wade PW. An assessment of sources, pathways, mechanisms and risks of current and potential future pollution of water and sediments in gold-mining areas of the Wonderfonteinspruit catchment. WRC Report No 1214/1/06. Pretoria: Water Research Commission; 2006. [ Links ]
61. Winde F. Challenges for sustainable water use in dolomitic mining regions of South Africa - A case study of uranium pollution. Part I: Sources and pathways. Phys Geogr. 2006;27(4):333-347. [ Links ]
62. Winde F. Uranium pollution of the Wonderfonteinspruit, 1997-2008. Part 1: Uranium toxicity, regional background and mining-related sources of uranium pollution. Water SA. 2010;36(3):239-256. [ Links ]
63. Winde F. Uranium pollution of the Wonderfonteinspruit, 1997-2008. Part 2: Uranium in water - Concentrations, loads and associated risks. Water SA. 2010;36(3):257-278. [ Links ]
64. South African Nuclear Energy Corporation (NECSA). Report of radioactivity analysis of fish and chicken. Job code RA 08190, 28 Aug. 2007, for Driefontein GM. Pretoria: South African Nuclear Energy Corporation; 2007 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
65. Barthel R. Radiological impact assessment of mining activities in the Wonderfonteinspruit catchment area, South Africa. In: Merkel BJ, Schipek M, editors. The new uranium mining boom, challenge and lessons learned. 6th International Conference. Freiberg: Springer; 2011. p. 517-527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22122-4_60 [ Links ]
66. IWQS (Institute for Water Quality Studies of the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, South Africa). Report on the radioactivity monitoring programme in the Mooi River (Wonderfonteinspruit) catchment. Report No. N/C200/00/RPQ/2399. Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry; 1999. [ Links ]
67. Winde F. Uranium pollution of water resources in mined-out and active goldfields of South Africa - A case study in the Wonderfonteinspruit catchment on extent and sources of U-pollution and associated health risks. In: Water Institute of Southern Africa, International Mine Water Association. International Mine Water Conference [CD ROM]. Pretoria: Document Transformation Technologies; 2009. p. 772-781. [ Links ]
68. Usher BH, Scott R. Post mining impacts of gold mining on the West Rand and West Wits Line. In: Hodgson FDI, Usher BH, Scott R, Zeelie S, Cruywagen LM, De Necker E, editors. Prediction techniques and preventative measures relating to the post-operational impact of underground mines on the quality and quantity of groundwater resources. WRC Report No 699/1/01. Pretoria: Water Research Commission; 2001. p. 5.1-5.117. [ Links ]
69. Winde F, Stoch EJ, Erasmus E. Identification and quantification of water ingress into mine voids of the West Rand and Far West Rand goldfields (Witwatersrand Basin) with a view to long-term sustainable reduction thereof. Final report, Project No 5512. Pretoria: Council for Geoscience; 2006 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
70. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry. Vaal River System: Large bulk water supply reconciliation strategy. Groundwater assessment: Dolomitic aquifers. Prepared by DMM Development Consultants, Golder Associates Africa, SRK, WRP Consulting Engineers and Zitholele Consulting. DWAF Report No P RSA C000/00/4406/06. Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Directorate National Water Resource Planning; 2006. [ Links ]
71. Winde F, Stoch EJ. Threats and opportunities for post-closure development in dolomitic gold mining areas of the West Rand and Far West Rand (South Africa) - A hydraulic view. Part 2: Opportunities. Water SA. 2010;36(1):75-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v36i1.50909 [ Links ]
72. Van Biljon M, Krantz R. Predicted rate of rewatering the Gemsbokfontein West groundwater compartment. Report to Harmony Gold Mining Limited. Johannesburg: Rison Consulting; 2001 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
73. De Roer K. Hydrologic impact of rewatering of the Gemsbokfontein dolomitic western subcompartment on the Wonderfonteinspruit, South Africa [thesis]. Potchefstroom: North-West University; 2004. [ Links ]
74. Winde F, Erasmus E. Peatlands as filters for polluted mine water? - A case study from an uranium-contaminated karst system in South Africa. Part I: Hydrogeological setting and U fluxes. Water. 2011;3(1):291-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w3010291 [ Links ]
75. Scott R. Investigation of the post mining impact on groundwater in the West Rand and West Wits Line mining areas. Third interim progress report to the Water Research Commission. Pretoria: Water Research Commission; 1997 [unpublished report]. [ Links ]
Faculty of Natural Sciences, North-West University, Private Bag X60
Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa
Received: 24 Apr. 2014
Revised: 28 Aug. 2014
Accepted: 16 Sep. 2014