SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.106 issue1-2 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

South African Journal of Science

Print version ISSN 0038-2353

S. Afr. j. sci. vol.106 n.1-2 Pretoria Jan./Feb. 2010

 

RESEARCH LETTER

 

Antibiotic resistance profiles of Escherichia coli isolated from different water sources in the Mmabatho locality, north-west province, South Africa

 

 

Constance N. Wose Kinge; C. Njie Ateba; D. Tonderai Kawadza

Department of Biological Sciences, North-West University, Mafikeng Campus, South Africa

Correspondence to

 

 


ABSTRACT

The antibiotic resistance profiles of Escherichia coli (E. coli), isolated from different water sources in the Mmabatho locality were evaluated. Water samples were collected from the local wastewater- and water-treatment plants, the Modimola Dam and homes in the area, and then analysed for the presence of E. coli, using standard methods. Presumptive isolates obtained were confirmed by the analytical profile index test. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by the disc diffusion method. Of the 230 E. coli isolates tested, marked antibiotic resistances (over 70%) were observed for erythromycin, tetracycline, ampicillin, chloramphenicol and norfloxacin. Multiple antibiotic resistance patterns were also compiled. Overall, the phenotype T-Ap-E was frequent for E. coli isolated from the local wastewater and water-treatment plants, Modimola Dam and tap water. Cluster analysis performed showed a unique antibiotic resistance pattern which suggested a link between isolates from all sampling points. The findings indicated that improper wastewater treatment may have a potential impact on the dissemination and survival of E. coli, as well as other pathogenic bacteria in water for human and animal consumption. This may result in water- and food-borne disease outbreaks with a negative effect on antibiotic therapy.

Keywords: E. coli; antibiotic resistance; multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) phenotypes; MAR indices; water-borne bacteria


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Escherichia coli (E. coli) is an organism that occurs universally in sewage and, because it is a faecal coliform, it plays an important role in the sanitary analysis of water.1 Its presence in water indicates the presence of faecal contamination and the likelihood of other pathogenic microbes.1 Five pathogenic strains of E. coli are frequently isolated from humans and animals suffering from diarrhoea.2 These differ from other commensals in that they express virulence factors, which are molecules directly involved in pathogenesis, but which are also important for normal metabolic functions.3 These pathogenic strains include:

• The enterotoxigenic E. coli strain, which causes traveller and infantile diarrhoea and is the main cause of haemolytic-uraemic syndrome associated with food-borne infections.4

• The enteroinvasive E. coli strain, which produces shigellosis-like diseases in children and adults.

• The enteropathogenic E. coli strain, which is the major cause of acute infantile diarrhoea in developing countries.

• The enteroaggressive E. coli strain, which produces persistent gastroenteritis and diarrhoea in infants and children,5,6 and is prevalent in developing countries.

• The enterohemorrhagic E. coli strain, which is the major cause of sporadic outbreaks of haemorrhagic colitis. 7,8,9

Antibiotic resistance in E. coli has been globally identified in isolates from environmental, animal and human sources.10 This is a consequence of the use of antimicrobials in medicine and their application in animal husbandry, which have brought about phenotypic changes, often due to chromosomal mutations.11 Studies have shown that many pathogenic organisms have developed some degree of resistance to antimicrobials and they confer resistance through different mechanisms, with a negative impact on veterinary and human medicine.10,12,13 These mechanisms of resistance include the alteration of receptor-binding sites of drugs, a decreased intake of drugs by altering the entry or active efflux of the drug, the destruction or inactivation of the drug, and development of resistant metabolic pathways. 13

The surfacing of antibiotic resistance usually results from the misuse of antibiotics as growth-promoters in animal production, for therapy and prophylaxis.14 Because humans consume these animal products, there is a probability of the spread of resistant strains from animals to humans and thus healthy individuals can become carrier hosts for multiple antibiotic-resistant bacteria.15 This may enhance the risk of developing haemolytic-uraemic syndrome, a disease more severe in children infected with E. coli O157:H7.16 Several studies have revealed that E. coli is resistant to a number of antibiotics. 17,18,19,20 Adding to the consequences of microbial resistance to antibiotics on human health, contamination of surface water bodies with resistant bacterial strains from human activities and livestock operations has also been reported.21 The objective of this study was to isolate E. coli organisms from water collected from different water sources in the Mmabatho locality in order to test their resistance to commonly used antibiotics.

 

METHODS

Collection of samples

Sampled sites were the inlet, primary, secondary, tertiary digesters and effluent from the local wastewater-treatment plant; the local water-treatment plant inlet and outlet; inlet, midpoint and outlet of the Modimola Dam; and tap water from a few homes in Units 8, 10 and 12 in the Mmabatho locality of the Mafikeng District.

Water samples were collected weekly over a period of two months (July to September 2006). Samples were collected aseptically in sterile 500 mL Schott Duran bottles, transported on ice to the Microbiology Laboratory at the Department of Biological Sciences, University of the North-West (South Africa) and plated out within 24 h.

Identification of E. coli isolates

Analyses of water samples were performed according to the standard method22 for total and faecal coliform counts on m-Endo (Merck , Johannesburg, South Africa) and m-FC (Merck, Johannesburg, South Africa) agar plates incubated at 37 ºC and 44.5 ºC for 24 h, respectively. Escherichia coli ATCC® 25922 was used as a positive control.23 Characteristic metallic-sheen and blue-coloured colonies on m-Endo and m-FC agar plates were selected and purified by streaking on nutrient agar (Biolab, Johannesburg, South Africa) plates. Plates were incubated at 37 ºC for 24 h and stored for further use. Isolates were Gram-stained according to standard methods24 and all Gram-negative isolates were subjected to primary and secondary biochemical identification. The primary biochemical tests performed were the triple sugar iron (TSI) agar, Simmons citrate agar, and oxidase tests, while the secondary biochemical test performed was the analytical profile index (API) 20E test. All tests were performed according to manufacturer's instructions (BioMérieux, France).

Antibiotic susceptibility test

Antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed on all E. coli positive isolates by the disc diffusion method, as previously described.25 Bacterial suspensions of isolates were prepared and aliquots of 100 µL plated out on Mueller Hinton agar (Merck, Johannesburg, South Africa). Antimicrobial discs (Mast Diagnostics, Sefton, UK) impregnated with kanamycin (30 µg), streptomycin (300 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), ampicillin (10 µg), norfloxacin (10 µg) and chloramphenicol (30 µg) were placed on the Mueller Hinton agar plates and incubated at 37 ºC for 24 h. After incubation, the inhibition zone diameters were measured and classified using reference values.26 Multiple antibiotic resistant (MAR) phenotypes were generated for isolates that showed resistance to three or more antibiotics. 27 MAR indices were evaluated as previously described.28

Cluster analysis

Susceptibility data for E. coli isolates from the different samples were determined using Ward's method and Euclidean distances on Statistica Software (version 7.0).

 

RESULTS

Antibiotic resistance data

A total of 230 E. coli isolates were obtained following biochemical characterisation (Table 1). Antibiogram results of E. coli isolates (Table 2) revealed resistance to more than one antibiotic, similar to reports by other researchers.15,29,30 Marked multiple antibiotic resistances (over 70%) were observed for erythromycin, tetracycline and ampicillin, chloramphenicol and norfloxacin. Multiple antibiotic resistance refers to the resistance of two or more classes of antibiotics. A large proportion (70%-95%) of E. coli isolated from wastewater samples obtained from the different sampling sites was resistant to chloramphenicol, norfloxacin, tetracycline, ampicillin and erythromycin. Similarly, a large proportion (80%-100%) of E. coli isolated from the Modimola Dam was resistant to chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and erythromycin. Furthermore, a large proportion (65%-100%) of E. coli isolated from the local water-treatment plant was resistant to tetracycline and erythromycin. Lastly, a 50%-90% resistance to chloramphenicol, tetracycline, ampicillin and erythromycin was observed for E. coli isolated from tap water. However, all tap water isolates were susceptible to norfloxacin. Susceptibility of a few isolates to streptomycin and kanamycin was also observed.

MAR phenotypes were compiled for all isolates obtained (Table 3). The predominant phenotypes from wastewater sites were T-Ap-E (20%, inlet), K-C-Nor-T-Ap-E (30%, primary), Nor-T-Ap-E and K-C-Nor-T-Ap-E (both 10%, secondary), K-C-Nor-T-Ap-E (50%, tertiary), and C-Nor-T-E (50%, effluent).

 

 

Similarly, the predominant phenotypes obtained for the local water-treatment plant were C-Nor-T-E and C-T-E at 20%, from the inlet and outlet, respectively. Also, predominant phenotypes from the Modimola Dam inlet, midpoint and outlet were Nor-T-Ap-E at 30%, C-Nor-T-E and C-T-Ap-E both at 20%, and T-Ap-E at 30%, respectively. C-Ap-E, T-Ap-E and C-T-Ap-E were the predominant phenotypes in tap water at 30%, 25% and 10% for Units 8, 10 and 12, respectively. Overall, T-Ap-E was a common phenotype observed for E. coli isolated from the local wastewater- and water-treatment plants, Modimola Dam and tap water.

A total of 65 E. coli isolates were randomly selected from all sampling sites and subjected to cluster analysis using the antibiotic inhibition zone diameter data. Two major clusters were generated, each subdivided into two minor clusters (IA, IB and IIA, IIB) as shown in Figure 1. Further analysis of the clusters was performed for patterns of associations of the isolates from the different sources as shown in Table 4. The analysis obtained was used as a tool in determining the uniqueness between the antibiotic resistance patterns of E. coli isolates from different areas. The largest cluster (Cluster IB) showed E. coli isolated from all sampled areas. The second largest (Cluster IA) represented E. coli isolated from wastewater, the local water-treatment plant (outlet) and tap water (Unit 10). Cluster IIA (the third largest cluster) represented E. coli isolated from the Modimola Dam (inlet, midpoint and outlet) and the local water-treatment plant (inlet and outlet). The smallest cluster (Cluster IIB) represented mostly E. coli from wastewater (secondary, tertiary and effluent digesters) and the local water-treatment plant (inlet).

 

 

DISCUSSION

The Enterobacteriaceae family has been linked to well-known antibiotic-resistant gene pools. These genes are transferred into the normal flora of humans and animals, 31 where they exert a strong selective pressure for the emergence and spread of resistance in both pathogenic and commensal bacteria. Eventually they find their way into the environment via wastewater, manure and sewage sludge.32 Based on the antibiotic-resistance patterns, we observed that all isolates tested were resistant to tetracycline (5%-95%), ampicillin (10%-80%), chloramphenicol (5%-80%) and erythromycin (50%-100%). The multiple antibiotic resistances of E. coli demonstrated in this study accord with those found in other studies. 15,21,28,30,33,34,35,36,37,38

Antimicrobial drugs have a widespread use in human and veterinary medicine, animal husbandry, aquaculture, agriculture and food technology.14 Therefore, animal feedstuffs are possible vehicles for transmission of resistant bacteria that could colonise the intestinal tract39 and negatively impact the health and economy of the affected communities. As observed from the cluster analysis performed, cluster IB contained isolates from all the sampling stations. This was a cause of concern because it showed a link between the resistant isolates from the local wastewater-treatment plant, Modimola Dam, the local water-treatment plant and tap water supplied to homes, suggesting that there had been a previous exposure of these isolates to the antibiotics tested. Hence, there might be a risk of antibiotic-resistant gene transmission within the population, which might have a negative effect on antibiotic therapy.

 

CONCLUSION

The high percentage of phenotypes of E. coli isolates that were MAR to chloramphenicol, tetracycline, ampicillin, and, particularly to erythromycin, suggested that there has been a misuse of these drugs, which has resulted in these water sources posing a potential threat to humans in the area. The indiscriminate use of antibiotics in humans and animals is cause for great concern. The high antibiotic resistance also indicates a negative impact on therapy with these classes of antibiotics. The periodic monitoring of antibiotics to detect any changing patterns would be necessary for effective treatments. Strict quality control measures also should be put in place to ensure proper treatment of water and wastewater in these and other treatment plants. This would ensure the discharge of properly treated wastewater into water bodies to prevent the occurrence and spread of water- and food-borne diseases. A further study to evaluate the extent of antibiotic resistance transmission and the impact of such transmission on the effectiveness of antibacterial use in human medicine is imperative.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors wish to thank the management and staff of the Mmabatho Wastewater- and Water-Treatment Plants for their collaboration in carrying out this work.

 

REFERENCES

1. Zamxaka M, Pironcheva G, Zamxaka NYO. Bacterial community patterns of domestic water sources in the Gogogo and Nkonkobe areas of the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Water SA. 2004a;30(3):341-346.         [ Links ]

2. Wasteson Y, Garvey P, McDowell DA, Coia J, Duffy G. Control of verocytogenic E. coli. Special edition of Int J Food Microbiol. 2001;66:1-2.         [ Links ]

3. Donnenberg MS, Whittman TS. Pathogen and evolution of virulence in enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic E. coli. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:539-548.         [ Links ]

4. Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HL. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:123-140.         [ Links ]

5. Cerna JF, Nataro JP, Estrada-Garcia T. Multiplex PCR for detection of three plasmid-borne genes of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli strains. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:2138-2140.         [ Links ]

6. Lopez-Saucedo C, Cerna JF, Villegas-Sepulveda N, et al. Single multiplex polymerase chain reaction to detect diverse loci associated with diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:127-131.         [ Links ]

7. Bingen E. Applications of molecular methods to epidemiological investigations of nosocomial infections in a paediatric hospital. Infect Cont Hosp Epidemiol. 1994;15(7):488-493.         [ Links ]

8. Gerber A, Karch H, Allerberger F, Verweyen HM, Zimmerhackl LB. Clinical course and the role of Shigatoxin-producing E. coli infection in haemolytic uremic syndrome in paediatric patients, 1997-2000, in Germany and Austria: a prospective study. J Infect Dis. 2002;186:493-500.         [ Links ]

9. Dow MA, Tóth I, Malik A, et al. Phenotypic and genetic characterisation of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) from diarrhoeal and non-diarrhoeal children in Libya. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;29:100-113.         [ Links ]

10. Heike von B, Reinhard M. Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli and therapeutic implications. Int J Med Microbiol. 2005;295(6-7):503-511.         [ Links ]

11. Walsh C, Duffy G, O'Mahony R, Fanning S, Blain IS, McDowell DA. Antimicrobial resistance in Irish isolates of verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli- VTEC. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005;109(3):173-178.         [ Links ]

12. Murray B. New aspects of antimicrobials resistance and the resulting therapeutic dilemmas. J Infect Dis. 1991;163:1185.         [ Links ]

13. Levy SB. Active efflux mechanisms for antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemo. 1992;36:695-703.         [ Links ]

14. Barbosa MT, Levy BS. The impact of antibiotic use on resistance development and persistence. Drug Res Upd. 2000;3:303-311.         [ Links ]

15. Reinthaler FF, Posch J, Feierl G, et al. Antibiotic resistance of E. coli in sewage and sludge. Wat Res. 2003;37:1685-1690.         [ Links ]

16. Wong CS, Jelacic S, Habeeb RL, Walkins SL, Tarr PL. The risk of the haemoytic-uraemic syndrome after antibiotic treatment of E. coli O157:H7 infections. New Engl J Med. 2000;342(26):1930-1936.         [ Links ]

17. Bass L, Liebert CA, Lee MD, et al. Incidence and characterization of integrons, genetic elements mediating multiple-drug resistance, in avian E. coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemo. 1999;43:2925-2929.         [ Links ]

18. Lindgren PK, Karlsson A, Hughes D. Mutation rate and evolution of fluoroquinolone resistance in Escherichia coli from patients with urinary tract infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemo. 2003;47:3222-3232.         [ Links ]

19. Roberts MC. Tetracycline therapy: Update. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:462-467.         [ Links ]

20. Kaye KS, Gold HS, Schwaber MJ, et al. Variety of β-lactamases produced by amoxicillin-clavulanate-resistant Escherichia coli isolated in the North-eastern United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemo. 2004;48:1520-1525.         [ Links ]

21. Harakeh S, Yassine H, EL- Fadel M. Antimicrobial resistant patterns of Escherichia coli and Salmonella strains in the aquatic Lebanese environments. Env Pol. 2006;143(2):269-277.         [ Links ]

22. APHA. Standard methods for the examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington DC. 1998.         [ Links ]

23. Lu J-J, Perng C-L, Lee S-Y, Wan C-C. Digestions for Detection and identification of Common Bacterial Pathogens in Cerebrospinal Fluid. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(6):2076-2080.         [ Links ]

24. Chapter 12. In: Cruickshank R, Duguid JP, Marmoin BP, Swain RH, editors. Medical Microbiology. 12th ed. New York: Longman, 1975; p. 3-4.1975        [ Links ]

25. Kirby-Bauer WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing by Single Disc Method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1996;45:4.         [ Links ]

26. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobials disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pennslyvania, Approved Standard M31-A19 (11):1999.         [ Links ]

27. Rota C, Yanguela J, Blanco D, Carraminana JJ, Arino A, Herrera A. High prevalence of multiple resistances to antibiotics in 144 Listera isolates from Spanish dairy and meat products. J Food Prot. 1996;59:938-943.         [ Links ]

28. Kaspar CW, Burgess JL, Knight IT, Colwell RR. Antibiotic resistance indexing of Escherichia coli to identify sources of faecal contamination in water. Can J Microbiol. 1990; 36:891-894.         [ Links ]

29. Noble RT, Moore DF, Leecaster MK, McGee CD, Weisberg SB. Comparison of total coliform, faecal coliform, and Enterococcus bacterial indicator response for ocean recreational quality testing. Water Res. 2003;37:1637-1643.         [ Links ]

30. Lin J, Biyela PT, Puckree T. Antibiotic resistance profiles of environmental isolates from Mhlathuze River, KwaZulu-Natal (RSA). Water SA. 2004;30(11):23-28.         [ Links ]

31. Lin J, Biyela PT. Convergent acquisition of antibiotic resistance determinants amongst the Enterobacteriaceae isolates of the Mhlathuze River, KwaZulu-Natal (RSA). Water SA 2005;31(2):25-260.         [ Links ]

32. Dancer SJ. How antibiotics can make us sick: the less obvious adverse effects of antimicrobials chemotherapy. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004;4:611-619.         [ Links ]

33. Müller EE, Ehlers MM, Grabow WOK. The occurrence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in South African water sources intended for direct and indirect human consumption. Water Res. 2001;35:3085-3088.         [ Links ]

34. Obi CL, Green E, Besong PO. Gene encoding virulence markers among E. coli isolates from diarrheic stool samples and river sources in rural Venda communities of SA. Water SA. 2004;30(1):37-42.         [ Links ]

35. Venter SN. Microbial water quality in the twenty-first century. Water Bul. 2001;27(1):16-17.         [ Links ]

36. Parveen S, Murphree RL, Edmiston L, Kaspar CW, Portier KM, Tamplin ML. Association of multiple-antibiotic-resistance profiles with point and non-point sources of Escherichia coli in Apalachicola Bay. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63(7):2607-2612.         [ Links ]

37. Webster LF, Thompson BC, Fulton MH, et al. Identification of Escherichia coli in South Carolina estuaries using antibiotic resistance analysis. J Exp Marine Biol Ecol. 2004;298:179-195.         [ Links ]

38. Mulamatthathil SG, Esterhuysen HA, Pretorius PJ. Antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in a virtually closed water reticulation system. Appl Microbiol. 2000;88:930-937.         [ Links ]

39. Kidd RS, Rossgnol AM, Gamroth MJ. Salmonella and other Enterobacteriaceae in dairy-cow feed ingredients: antimicrobials resistance in western Oregon. J Environ Health. 2002;64(9):9-16.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence to:
Constance Wose Kinge
Department of Biological Sciences
North-West University (Mafikeng Campus)
Private Bag X2046
Mmabatho 2735 South Africa
email: conskinge@hotmail.com

Received: 18 June 2009
Accepted: 05 Nov. 2009
Published: 11 Mar. 2010

 

 

This article is available at: http://www.sajs.co.za