SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.103 issue3-4 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


South African Journal of Science

On-line version ISSN 1996-7489
Print version ISSN 0038-2353

S. Afr. j. sci. vol.103 n.3-4 Pretoria Mar./Apr. 2007

 

SCIENCE POLICY

 

Correlations between advertising and R&D expenditures: Dealing with important intangibles

 

 

William Blankley

Centre for Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (CeSTII), Knowledge Systems, Human Sciences Research Council, Private Bag X9182, Cape Town 8000, South Africa. E-mail: wblankley@hsrc.ac.za

 

 


ABSTRACT

Expenditures on research and experimental development (R&D) and advertising by companies are forms of capital investment in intangible commodities as opposed to capital investment in tangible commodities such as plant and equipment. The amounts spent on both advertising (adspend) and R&D are positively related to the profitability of commercial enterprises. Various studies have recorded the links between R&D and adspend at the level of firms, sub-sectors and sectors of industry for particular countries. However, no analyses appear to have been published on the associations between these two kinds of investment either at national level or in international comparisons. The findings presented here indicate that the most-developed countries spend between two and six times more on R&D per capita than on advertising. In less R&D-intensive economies, however, adspend may equal or exceed R&D expenditure per capita. In four countries examined, that have the lowest investment in R&D as a percentage of GDP-namely South Africa, Greece, Portugal and Poland-adspend actually exceeds gross expenditure on R&D. I focus on the link between R&D and adspend in South Africa between 1989 and 2004, for which a highly significant correlation (r = 0.99) was found. I also examine international comparisons of reliable data and indicator series concerning these factors in 17 other countries between 1995 and 2004. In the majority of EU and other countries for which relevant advertising and R&D data were available, significant correlations were also found between these two variables. Because total advertising figures tend to be published within the first quarter of the following year, it may be possible to use these statistics to forecast national R&D expenditure. The benefits for businesses to continue investing in both advertising and R&D, even under adverse economic conditions, are also discussed.


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

REFERENCES

1. Webster E. (1999). The growth of enterprise intangible investment. Melbourne Institute Working Paper No. 9/99.         [ Links ]

2. Andras T.L. and Srinivasan S.S. (2003). Advertising intensity and R&D intensity: differences across industries and their impact on firm's performance. Int. J. Bus. Econ. 2(2), 167-176.         [ Links ]

3. South African Science and Technology Indicators 1996, chap. 4: Research and Development (R&D) Resource Allocation and Activities. Foundation for Research Development, Pretoria (1997).         [ Links ]

4. OECD Main Science and Technology Indicators 2006/1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris (2006).         [ Links ]

5. European Advertising and Media Forecast Database (2005). Trends in Advertising Expenditure, April 2005, 19(4).         [ Links ]

6. Anon. (2006). Spending signals health. ADFOCUS 2006: 110. Financial Mail (Johannesburg) Special Supplement. Data on adspend reported on as provided by Adex Nielsen Media Research.         [ Links ]

7. National Survey of Research and Experimental Development (R&D) 2004/05 Fiscal Year: High-Level Key Results. Department of Science and Technology, Pretoria (2006).         [ Links ]

8. Blankley W. and Kahn M. (2005). The history of research and experimental development measurement in South Africa and some current perspectives. S. Afr. J. Sci. 101, 151-156.         [ Links ]

9. Matraves C. (1998). Market structure, R&D and advertising in the pharmaceutical industry. Discussion Paper, Social Science Research Center, Berlin, (WZB) FS IV98-17, September 1998.         [ Links ]

10. Morbey G.K. and Dugal S.S. (1992). Corporate R&D spending during a recession. Research, Technology Management 35(4), July-August.         [ Links ]

11. Schleiffer K. (2000). Project management - marketing versus R&D: spanning the divide. Medical Device Link, the online information service for the medical device industry: www.devicelink.com        [ Links ]

12. Hounwanou L. (2006). Understanding the behaviour of South African leader service companies with regard to R&D. HSRC, CeSTII internal project report, Cape Town.         [ Links ]

13. Advertising expenditure in Latin America for 2003 obtained from Zenith Optimedia press release: Demand for traditional advertising firm; Internet up again, 20 July 2005. Online: www.zenithoptimedia.com        [ Links ]

14. R&D expenditure for Latin American countries obtained from RICYT indicator database. Online: www.ricyt.edu.ar        [ Links ]

15. GDP figures for Latin America obtained from Euromonitor International 2005, based on International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics. Online: www.euromonitor.com        [ Links ]

16. Advertising as a percentage of GDP for Latin America, Brazil, China and India for 2005 from data provided by www.equitymaster.com/research-it/sector-info/media/        [ Links ]

17. R&D for India 2002 from http://dst.gov.in/majorhighlights.pdf; R&D for Brazil 2003 from www.ricyt.edu.ar/ Comparative Indicators; R&D for China for 2004 from OECD (2006).         [ Links ]4

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License