SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.103 issue1-2Screening of four Cyclopia (honeybush) species for putative phyto-oestrogenic activity by oestrogen receptor binding assaysPhysical, chemical and optical properties of aerosol particles collected over Cape Town during winter haze episodes author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

South African Journal of Science

On-line version ISSN 1996-7489

S. Afr. j. sci. vol.103 n.1-2 Pretoria Jan./Feb. 2007

 

RESEARCH ARTICLES

 

Impacts of a South African coastal golf estate on shrubland bird communities

 

 

Sarah-Jane C. Fox; Philip A.R. Hockey

DST/NRF Centre of Excellence at the Percy FltzPatrlck Institute, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa

 

 


ABSTRACT

Golf courses and estates are one form of development threatening coastal vegetation in South Africa's Cape Floristic Region. They occupy substantial tracts of land, fragmenting indigenous vegetation. This study investigates the effects on bird community structure and function of replacing natural Strandveld vegetation with a 170-ha golf estate in which 46 ha of Strandveld vegetation was retained in conditions ranging from pristine to moderately degraded. Bird assemblages of the remaining Strandveld patches in the golf estate were compared with those of an adjacent Strandveld conservation area. Field work was conducted during the birds' breeding season, in October and November 2005. The golf estate was more species rich overall, but many species were uncommon, several were present only as a consequence of the creation of new habitats, and species were not evenly distributed across the remaining Strandveld fragments. Bird diversity and abundance were significantly higher in the adjacent conservation area. It is estimated that more than 8500 individual birds were displaced by construction of the golf estate and four Strandveld species were not represented at all within the estate. Within the estate, species richness rose with increasing Strandveld patch size and the minimum area of continuous pristine vegetation required to maintain the natural species assemblage was estimated at 51 ha. The golf estate was characterized by a high proportion of generalist and granivorous species, but at the cost of reduced numbers of frugivores and nectarivores. Energy flow through the bird communities in the two areas was thus markedly different, and pollination and fruit dispersal potential within the golf estate were reduced substantially. Golf courses and golf estates inevitably will not substitute for the natural habitats they have replaced, but careful design with input from ecological theory can reduce the adverse effects of fragmentation.


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

References

1. Mittermeier R.A., Robles Gil P., Hoffman M., Pilgrim J., Brooks T., Mittermeier C.G., Lamoreux J. and da Fonesca G.A.B. (2004). Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Threatened Terrestrial Ecosystems. CEMEX, Mexico City.         [ Links ]

2. Rebelo A.G. (1992). Red data book species in the Cape Floristic Region: threats, priorities and target species. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 48, 55-86.         [ Links ]

3. van Wilgen B.W., Bond WJ. and Richardson D.M. (1992). Ecosystem management. In The Ecology of Fynbos: Nutrients, Fire and Diversity, ed. R. Cowling, pp. 345-371. Oxford University Press. Cape Town.         [ Links ]

4. Lombard A.T., Cowling R.M., Pressey R.L. and Mustart PJ. (1997). Reserve selection in a species-rich and fragmented landscape on the Agulhas Plain, South Africa. Conserv. Biol. 11, 1101-1116.         [ Links ]

5. Biggs R. and Scholes R. J. (2002). Land-cover changes in South Africa 1911-1993. S. Afr. J. Sci. 98, 420-424.         [ Links ]

6. Gelderblom C.M., van Wilgen B.W., Nel J.L., Sandwith T., Botha M. and Hauck M. (2003). Turning strategy into action: implementing a conservation action plan in the Cape Floristic Region. Biol. Conserv. 112, 291-297.         [ Links ]

7. Myers N., Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G, da Forseca., G.A.B. and Kent J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 852-858.         [ Links ]

8. Anon. (2005). Rapid Review of Golf Course and Polo Field Development, Final Report. Department of Environmental Affairs and Planning, Western Cape, Cape Town.         [ Links ]

9. Low A.B. and Rebelo A.G. (1996). Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria.         [ Links ]

10. Tanner R.A. and Gange A.C. (2005). Effects of golf courses on local biodiversity. Landsc. Urban Plan. 71, 137-146.         [ Links ]

11. Platt A.E. (1990). Toxic green - the trouble with golf. World Watch 7(3), 27-32.         [ Links ]

12. Terman M.R. (1997). Natural links: naturalistic golf courses as wildlife habitat. Landsc. Urban Plan. 38, 183-197.         [ Links ]

13. Blair R.B. (1996). Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol. Appl. 6(2), 506-519.         [ Links ]

14. Blair R.B. (1999). Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity? Ecol. Appl. 9(1), 164-170.         [ Links ]

15. Blair R.B. and Launer A.E. (1997). Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biol. Conserv. 80, 113-125.         [ Links ]

16. Mankin K.R. (2000). An integrated approach for modelling and managing golf course water quality and ecosystem diversity. Ecol. Mod. 133, 259-267.         [ Links ]

17. Gange A.C., Lindsay A.E. and Schofield J.M. (2003). The ecology of golf courses. Biologist 50(2), 63-68.         [ Links ]

18. Yasuda M. and Koike F. (2006). Do golf courses provide a refuge for flora and fauna in Japanese urban landscapes? Landsc. Urban Plan. 75(1-2), 58-68.         [ Links ]

19. Wiens J.A. (1989). The Ecology of Bird Communities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.         [ Links ]

20. Cody M.L. (1981). Habitat selection in birds: the roles of vegetation structure, competitors, and productivity. BioScience 31, 107-112.         [ Links ]

21. Erdelen M. (1984). Bird communities and vegetation structure: I. Correlations and comparisons of simple diversity indices. Oecologia 61, 277-284.         [ Links ]

22. Knopf F.L. (1988). Avianassemblages onaltered grasslands. Stud. AvianBiol. 15, 247-257.         [ Links ]

23. Bibby C.J. (1999). Making the most of birds as environmental indicators. Ostrich 70, 81-87.         [ Links ]

24. Cueto V.R. and Casenave J.L. (1999). Determinants of bird species richness: role of climate and vegetation structure at a regional scale. J. Biogeogr. 26, 487-492.         [ Links ]

25. Dean W.R.J., Anderson M.D., Milton S.J. and Anderson T.A. (2002). Avian assemblages in native Acacia and alien Prosopis drainage line woodland in the Kalahari, South Africa. J. Arid Environ. 51, 1-19.         [ Links ]

26. Cowling R.M. and Richardson D.M. (1995). Fynbos: South Africa's Unique Floral Kingdom. Fernwood Press, Cape Town.         [ Links ]

27. La Sorte F.A. (2006). Geographical expansion and increased prevalence of common species in avian assemblages: implications for large-scale patterns of species richness. J. Biogeogr. 33, 1183-1191.         [ Links ]

28. Verner J. (1986). Predicting effects of habitat patchiness and fragmentation-the researcher's viewpoint. In Wildlife 2000: Modelling Habitat Relationships of Terrestrial Vertebrates, eds J. Verner, M.L. Morrison and C.J. Ralph, pp. 327-329. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.         [ Links ]

29. Murphy D.D. (1989). Conservation and confusion: wrong species, wrong scale, wrong conclusions. Conserv. Biol. 3, 82-84.         [ Links ]

30. Webb N.R. (1989). Studies on the invertebrate fauna of fragmented heathland in Dorset, U.K., and the implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 47, 153-165.         [ Links ]

31. Saunders D.A., Hobbs R.J. and Margules C.R. (1991). Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv. Biol. 5(1), 18-32.         [ Links ]

32. Hobbs R.J. (1992). The role of corridors in conservation: solution or band-wagon? Trends Ecol. Evol. 7, 389-392.         [ Links ]

33. Forman R.T.T. (1995). Land Mosaics, the Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.         [ Links ]

34. Harrison S. and Fahrig L. (1995). Landscape pattern and population conservation. In Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution, eds I.A. Hanski, and M.E. Gilpin, pp. 43-63. Academic Press, San Diego.         [ Links ]

35. Wiens J.A. (1997). Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology. In Metapopulation Biology: Ecology,GeneticsandEvolution,eds I.A. Hanskiand M.E. Gilpin, pp. 43-63. Academic Press, San Diego.         [ Links ]

36. Mucinal. and Rutherford M.C. (2004). Vegetation mapofSouthAfrica,Lesothoand Swaziland: shapefiles of basic mapping units. Beta version 4.0. February2004, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town.         [ Links ]

37. Liengme C.A. (1987). West coast Strandveld: its utilization and management, M.Sc. thesis, University of Cape Town, Cape Town.         [ Links ]

38. Bibby C.J., Burgess N.D. and Hill D.A. (1992). Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press, London.         [ Links ]

39. Magurran A.E. (1988). Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.         [ Links ]

40. KrebsC.J. (1999). Ecological Methodology, 2nd edn. Addison-Welsey,Menlo Park, CA.         [ Links ]

41. Clarke K.R. and Warwick R.M. (1994). Changes in Marine Communities: an Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth.         [ Links ]

42. BrayJ.R. and Curtis J.T. (1957). An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27, 325-449.         [ Links ]

43. StatSoft, Inc. (2004). STATISTICA, version 7. Tulsa, OK.         [ Links ]

44. Zar J.H. (1999). Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.         [ Links ]

45. Hockey P.A.R., Dean WR.J. and Ryan PPG. (Eds) (2005). Roberts - Birds of Southern Africa, 7th edn. Trustees of the John Voelcker Bird Book Fund, Cape Town.         [ Links ]

46. Collins B.T. (1990). Using rerandomising tests in route-regression analysis of avian population trends. In Survey Design and Statistical Methods for the Estimation of Avian Population Trends, Biological Report 90(1), eds J.R. Sauer and S. Droege, pp. 63-70. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.         [ Links ]

47. Nagy K.A., Girard I.A. and Brown T.K. (1999). Energetics of free-ranging mammals, reptiles, and birds. Ann. Rev. Nutr. 19, 247-77.         [ Links ]

48. Dean W.R.J. (2000). Factors affecting bird diversity patterns in the Karoo, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 96, 609-616.         [ Links ]

49. Hansen A.J., Knight R.L., Marzluff J.M., Powell S., Brown K., Gude PH. and Jones K. (2005). Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: patterns, mechanisms and research needs. Ecol. Appl. 15(6), 1893-1905.         [ Links ]

50. Corlett R.T. (2000). Environmental heterogeneity and species survival in degraded tropical landscapes. In The Ecological Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity, eds M.J. Hutchings, E.A. John and A.J.A. Stewart, pp. 333-355. British Ecological Society, London.         [ Links ]

51. Diamond J.M. (1972). Biogeographic kinetics: estimation of relaxation times for avifaunas of Southwest Pacific Islands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. US A 69,3199-3203.         [ Links ]

52. Tilman T., May R.M., Lehman C.L. and Nowak M.A. (1994).Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371, 65-66.         [ Links ]

53. Dytham C. (2000). Habitat destruction and extinctions: predictions from metapopulations. In The Ecological Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity, eds M.J. Hutchings, E.A. John and A.J.A. Stewart, pp. 315-331. British Ecological Society, London.         [ Links ]

54. Diamond J.M. (1975) The island dilemma: lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of nature reserves. Biol. Conserv. 7, 129-146.         [ Links ]

55. Wilson E.O. and Willis E.O. (1975). Applied biogeography. In Ecology and Evolution of Communities, eds M.L. Cody and J.M. Diamond, pp. 522-534. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.         [ Links ]

56. Cowling R.M., Pressey R.L., Lombard A.T., Desmet P.G. and Ellis A.G. (1999). From representation to persistence: requirements for a sustainable system of conservation areas in the species-rich Mediterranean-climate desert of southern Africa. Diversity Distrib. 5, 51-71.         [ Links ]

57. Margules C.R. and Pressey R.L. (2000). Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405, 243-253.         [ Links ]

58. Horvath A.M. (1993). The impacts of edge effects in artificially fragmentedS trandveld habitats. B.Sc. (Hons) thesis, University of Cape Town, South Africa.         [ Links ]

59. Lloyd P. (2004). Comparative breeding success of yellow bishop Euplectes capensis in two adjoining habitats. Ostrich 75(4), 327-328.         [ Links ]

60. Woods M., McDonald R.A., and Harris S. (2003). Predation of wildlife by domestic cats Felis catus in Great Britain. Mammal Rev. 33, 174-188.         [ Links ]

61. Schwarzenberger A. and Dean W.R.J. (2003). The influence of vegetation structure on bird communities in a Karoo village, South Africa. Ostrich 73(3&4), 209-216.         [ Links ]

62. Little R.M. and Crowe T.M. (1994). Conservation implications of deciduous fruit farming on birds in the Elgin district, Western Cape Province, South Africa. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 49, 185-198.         [ Links ]

63. Rebelo A.G. (1987). Bird pollination in the Cape flora. In A Preliminary Synthesis of Pollination Biology in the Cape Flora, ed. A.G. Rebelo,pp. 83-108. S. Afr. Natl Sci. Prog. Rep. 141. CSIR, Pretoria.         [ Links ]

64. Knight R.S. (1988). Aspects of plant dispersal in the southwestern Cape with particular reference to the roles of birds as dispersal agents. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cape Town, South Africa.         [ Links ]

65. Manning J. and Goldblatt P (1996). West Coast: South African Wild Flower Guide 7. Botanical Society of South Africa, Claremont.         [ Links ]

66. Cameron A. (1999). The effects of fragmentation of renosterveld vegetation on bird community composition. M.Sc. thesis, University of Cape Town, South Africa.         [ Links ]

67. Randrianasolo H. (2003). Birds in west coast renosterveld fragments: implications for threatened habitat. M.Sc. thesis, University of Cape Town, South Africa.         [ Links ]

68. Daniels C.L., Downs C.T. and Maclean G.L. (2001). Arthropods in the diet of nectarivorous sunbirds (Passeriformes: Nectariniidae) and sugarbirds (Passeriformes: Promeropidae). Durban Mus. Novit. 9, 59-91.         [ Links ]

69. Pauw A. (1998). Pollen transfer on birds' tongues. Nature 394, 731-732.         [ Links ]

70. Stouffer P.C. and Bierregaard R.O. (1995). Use of Amazonian forest fragments by understorey insectivorous birds. Ecology 76, 2429-2445.         [ Links ]

71. Christiansen M.B. and Pitter E. (1997). Species loss in a forest bird community near Lagoa Santa in southeastern Brazil. Biol. Conserv. 80, 23-32.         [ Links ]

72. Chiarello A.G. (1999). Effects of fragmentation of the Atlantic forest on mammal communities in south-eastern Brazil. Biol. Conserv. 89, 71-82.         [ Links ]

73. Renjifo L.M. (1999). Composition changes in a subandean avifauna after long-term forest fragmentation. Conserv. Biol. 13, 1124-1139.         [ Links ]

74. Estrada A., Coates-Estrada R. and Meritt, D. (1994). Non-flying mammals and landscape changes in the tropical rain forest region of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Ecography 17, 229-241.         [ Links ]

 

 

Received 8 August 2006.
Accepted 16 December 2006.

 

 

Author for correspondence. E-mail: phil.hockey@uct.ac.za

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License