SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.110 issue10Pricing of South African thermal coal exportsDeveloping green energy projects in Southern Africa - a mining investment approach author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

On-line version ISSN 2411-9717
Print version ISSN 0038-223X

J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. vol.110 n.10 Johannesburg Oct. 2010

 

JOURNAL PAPERS

 

A comparison of the processes used during the development of the national mineral policies of Tanzania and Namibia

 

 

H.D. Mtegha; F.T. Cawood; R.C.A. Minnitt

School of Mining Engineering, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa

 

 


SYNOPSIS

Mining is important to the economies of both Tanzania and Namibia. Recently, both nations revised their national mineral policies to ensure future economic benefit. The main difference in the mineral policy-formulation processes followed by the two countries is identified as the degree and timing of stakeholder involvement during the articulation process. In the case of Namibia, the stakeholders were involved from the start in identifying issues and in suggesting policy solutions. In contrast, the Tanzanian process involved stakeholders after a framework had been developed by a task team. The Tanzanian emphasis was on attracting foreign investment into a traditionally state enterprise system of mineral investment and development. One can argue that the policies developed met the initial requirements, and both are, therefore successful, despite the different processes of policy formulation that were used. However, several fundamental questions arise as a result of the two approaches. This paper attempts to answer these questions by providing a comparison of the processes used for developing and formulating the mineral policies of Tanzania and Namibia. It concludes that the Namibian consultative process is perhaps more sustainable in the long-term because of its wider public support. Time will tell which of these policy-formulation processes provides a basis for sustainable economic growth for developing mineral economies.

Keywords: National, policy-formulation, stakeholder, investment, mineral development, consultative process


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

References

BUCK, W.K. and ELVER, R.B. An Approach to Mineral Policy Formulation. Mineral Information Bulletin MR 108. Mineral Resources Branch, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa. A paper delivered at United Nations Mineral Economics Seminar, Ankara, Turkey, Octoer 12-24, 1970, under the title Mineral Economics and National Mineral Policy.         [ Links ]

MINISTRY OF LANDS AND MINERAL RESOURCES, FIJI. The Principles Underlying Government's Mineral Policy. Available from http://www.mrd.gov.fj/gfiji/mining/minrlpol/index.html, Accessed 29 April 2008.         [ Links ]

MCMAHON, F. and VIDLER, C. Building a Sound Mining Policy. Environment and Communities, Available from MINING.com. Accessed April, 2008.         [ Links ]

MINISTERIAL COUNCIL ON MINERAL AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES (MCMPR). Principles for Engagement with Communities and Stakeholders. Australian Government, Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources, 2005. Available from http://www.ret.gov.au/Section/ResourcesandEnergy/Pages/PrinciplesforEngagementwithCommunitiesandStakeholders.aspx. Accessed April 2008.         [ Links ]

MEPC, Towards Developing a Strategy for the SADC Mining Sector. The SADC Protocol on Mining Implementation Workshop, Pretoria, South Africa, April 2001.         [ Links ]

MINISTRY OF MINES AND ENERGY, Mineral Policy of Namibia, 2003. Available from http://www.mme.gov.na/pdf/minerals_policy_draft_final.pdf .Accessed 14 March 2006.         [ Links ]

MTEGHA, H.D. Towards a Minerals Policy for the Southern African Development Community (SADC), PhD Thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2005.         [ Links ]

NRCAN, Excerpts from Canada's Minerals and Metals Policy. Natural Resources Canada, Available from http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/miningtax/inv_5.htm. Accessed 29 April 2008.         [ Links ]

ONORATO, W., FOX, P., and STRONGMAN, J. WORLD BANK GROUP ASSISTANCE FOR MINERALS SECTOR: DEVELOPMENT AND REFORM IN MEMBER COUNTRIES. World Bank Technical Paper No. 405. Washington D.C.: The World Bank. 1998. 48 pp.         [ Links ]

OTTO, J.M. A national mineral policy as regulatory tool. RESOURCES POLICY, vol. 23, no. ½. 1997. pp. 1-7.         [ Links ]

SHEPARD, R.B. Gaining a Social licence to mine. Available from MINING.com. Accessed April 2008.         [ Links ]

ECONOMIC RESEARCH BUREAU, UNIVERSITY OF DAR-ES-SALAAM. Tanzania Strategy Profiles, prepared for the Planning Commission December 2000, available from http://www.nssd.net/pdf/tz05.pdf. Accessed 07 December 2005.         [ Links ]

UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME. Tanzania Project on Situation Analysis of the Tanzania Mining Sector, United Nations, 2003.         [ Links ]

MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND MINERALS. United Republic of Tanzania, The Mineral Policy of Tanzania, 1997. Available from http://www.tzonline.org/pdf/themineralpolicyofTanzania.pdf. Accessed 14 March 2006.         [ Links ]

URS AUSTRALIA. Stakeholder Involvement and Consultation, Available from http://www.nt.gov.au/nreta/environment/assessment/register/bwnside/pdf., Accessed 2 April 2008.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License