SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.110 número10Tensile strength testing of thin spray-on liner products (TSLs) and shotcreteDesign of Merensky Reef crush pillars índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados



Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google


Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

versão On-line ISSN 2411-9717
versão impressa ISSN 0038-223X

J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. vol.110 no.10 Johannesburg Out. 2010




A comparison of limit equilibrium and numerical modelling approaches to risk analysis for open pit mining



H.T. Chiwaye; T.R. Stacey

School of Mining Engineering, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa




Risk analysis is an important step in the design of rock slopes in open pit mining. Risk is defined as the product of the probability of slope failure and the consequences of the failure, and is generally evaluated in terms of safety and economic risk. Most of the risk analysis done at present is based on the use of limit equilibrium (LE) techniques in evaluating the probability of failure (POF) of the slopes. The approach typically makes use of full Monte Carlo simulations of the limit equilibrium models, with all uncertain variables randomly varied. The number of required simulations is generally over a thousand, at times as high as 20 000, in order to produce statistically valid results of the POF. Such an approach is clearly not practical when using numerical modelling programs due to the high computational effort required. This paper explores the impact of using numerical modelling instead of the traditional LE techniques in evaluating the probability of slope failure. The difference in the overall assessed risk, in terms of economic impact, for the mining operation is then evaluated. With numerical models, approximate methods are used in the calculation of the probability of failure instead of full Monte Carlo simulations. This paper will use a method called the response surface methodology (RSM) for estimating the POF from numerical analyses. Simple slope models were used to verify the accuracy of the RSM method by comparing the results with those obtained from full Monte Carlo simulations. It is shown that there is good agreement between the POF values computed using full Monte Carlo simulation and those obtained using the RSM method. Finally, the use of numerical modelling in the assessment of risk is shown to bring a significant difference in the result compared with that from LE methods. One of the reasons for the difference is that LE models tend to underestimate the failure volumes and hence the consequences of slope failure.

Keywords: Risk, probability of failure, limit equilibrium, numerical modelling, Monte Carlo simulation, response surface methodology



“Full text available only in PDF format”




BAECHER, G.B., and CHRISTIAN, J.T. Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. Wiley, Chichester, U.K. 2003.         [ Links ]

BAKER, J.W. and CORNELL, C.A. Uncertainty Specification and Propagation for Loss Estimation Using FOSM Methods, Proceedings Ninth International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP9). San Francisco, California. 2003.         [ Links ]

CARLEY, K.M., KAMNEVA, N.Y., and REMINGA, J. Response Surface Methodology, CASOS technical report. 2004.         [ Links ]

CHIWAYE, H.T. Dissertation, A comparison of limit equilibrium and numerical modeling approaches to risk analysis for open pit mining, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. 2010.         [ Links ]

CHRISTIAN, J.T. Geotechnical Engineering Reliability: How Well Do We Know What We Are Doing, Thirty-Ninth Karl Terzaghi Lecturer, 2003, Nashville, Tenn., Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering © ASCE/October 2004.         [ Links ]

CHRISTIAN, J.T. AND BAECHER, G.B. The point estimate method with large numbers of variables, International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, vol. 26, 2002. pp. 1515-1529.         [ Links ]

CONTRERAS, L.F., LESUEUR, R., and MARAN. J. A Case Study of Risk Evaluation at Cerejon Mine. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Stability of Rock Slopes in Open Pit Mining and Civil Engineering Situations, 3-6 April 2006, Cape Town, South Africa. SAIMM. Symposium Series S44, Johannesburg, South Africa. 2006.         [ Links ]

HAMMAH, R.E. and YACOUB, T.E. Probabilistic Slope Analysis with the Finite Element Method, 43rd US Rock Mechanics Symposium and 4th U.S.-Canada Rock Mechanics Symposium, Asheville, ARMA 09-149. 2009.         [ Links ]

HARR, M.E. Reliability-based design in civil engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1987.         [ Links ]

HOEK, E. Practical Rock Engineering, Course notes, University of Toronto. 2006.         [ Links ]

HONG, P. Point estimate moment-based reliability analysis, Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, vol. 13, no. 4, August 1996, pp. 281-294        [ Links ]

HONG, P. An efficient point estimate method for probabilistic analysis, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 59, no. 3, March 1998, pp. 261-267(7)        [ Links ]

KINZELBACH, W. and SIEGFRIED, T. Conditional first-order second-moment method and its application to the quantification of uncertainty in groundwater modelling, Water Resources Research, vol. 38, no. 4, 2002. p. 1035, 10.1029/2000WR000022.         [ Links ]

KIRSTEN, H.A.D. Significance of the Probability of Failure in Slopes Engineering, The Civil Engineer in South Africa, vol. 25, no. 1, 1982. pp. 17-27.         [ Links ]

MOLLON, G., DIAS, D., and SOUBRA, A. Probabilistic Analysis of Circular Tunnels in Homogeneous Soils Using Response Surface Methodology, Journal of Geotechnical and Geo-Environmental Engineering, vol. 139, no. 9, ASCE September 2009.         [ Links ]

MORGAN, M.G. and HENRION, M. Uncertainty: A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press, London, UK. 1990.         [ Links ]

PRIEST, S.D. and BROWN, E.T. Probabilistic stability analysis of variable rock slopes. Trans. Instn Min. Metall. vol. 92, 1983. pp. AI-AI2.         [ Links ]

READ, J.R.L. and STACEY, P.F. Guidelines for Open Pit Slope Design, CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Australia, 2009.         [ Links ]

ROSENBLUETH, E. Point estimation for probability moments, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1975, vol. 72, pp. 3812-3814        [ Links ]

ROSENBLUETH, E. Two-point estimates in probability. Appl. Math. Modelling 1981, pp. 329-335.         [ Links ]

TAPIA, A., CONTRERAS, L.F., JEFFERIES, M.G., and STEFFEN, O. Risk evaluation of slope failure at Chuquicamata Mine. Proc. Int. Symp. Rock Slope Stability in Open Pit Mining and Civil Engineering, 2007. pp. 477-485, Perth. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, ISBN 978 0 9756756 8 7.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons