SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.110 issue10A comparison of limit equilibrium and numerical modelling approaches to risk analysis for open pit mining author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

On-line version ISSN 2411-9717
Print version ISSN 0038-223X

J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. vol.110 n.10 Johannesburg Oct. 2010

 

TRANSACTION PAPERS

 

Tensile strength testing of thin spray-on liner products (TSLs) and shotcrete

 

 

H. Yilmaz

University of the Witwatersrand, School of Mining Engineering, Johannesburg, South Africa

 

 


SYNOPSIS

Tensile strength testing has been one of the most common physical property testing methods of thin spray-on liner (TSL) products worldwide. However, the variety of products tested has been insufficient for comparison purposes. Specimen preparation procedures and test parameters such as curing time and loading rate are not reported well. Comprehensive tensile strength testing on 20 TSL products and one plain shotcrete brand was performed over 28 days of curing period. Detailed information on the test procedures with particular attention on the important aspects during sample preparation and test execution are provided. As expected, the tensile strength increases with increasing curing period. The test results make the categorization and comparison of liner products possible.

Keywords: Thin spray-on liner, TSL, tensile strength test, TSL tensile strength, shotcrete tensile strength, tensile strength category, curing period, repeatability index


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

References

ARCHIBALD, J.F. 2001. Assessing acceptance criteria for and capabilities of liners for mitigating ground falls. Mining Health and Safety Conference, Sudbury, Ontario, April 2001, 2001. 31. pp.         [ Links ]

ASTM D638. Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. American National Standard on Mechanical Properties, vol. 8.01, Plastics (I): D 256-D2343, April, 1998, pp. 46-58.         [ Links ]

HAHN, T. AND HOLMGREN, J. Adhesion of shotcrete to various types of rock surfaces. Proc. 4th Congress of the Int. Society for Rock Mechanics. Balkema, 1979. pp. 431-439.         [ Links ]

HELMUTH, R.A Structure and rheology of fresh cement paste. Proc 7th Intl Cong, Chem. Cem. Paris, VI.0, 16, 1980. pp. 16-30.         [ Links ]

LACERDA, L. and RISPIN, M. Current ground support membrane applications in North American underground mines. 2nd International seminar on Surface Support Liners: Thin Sprayed Liners, Shotcrete, Mesh. Crowne Plaza Sandton, South Africa. 2002.         [ Links ]

OZTURK, H. and TANNANT, D.D. Thin spray-on liner adhesive strength test method and effect of liner thickness on adhesion. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci, doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms. 2010.05.004. 2010.         [ Links ]

SPEARING, A.J.S. and GELSON, J. Developments and the future of thin reactive liners since the previous conference in Australia. 2nd Int. Seminar on Surface Support Liners: Thin Sprayed Liners, Shotcrete, Mesh. SAIMM, Sandton, South Africa, Sect. 13, 2002. pp.1-10.         [ Links ]

TANNANT, D.D., SWAN, G., ESPLEY, S., and GRAHAM, C. 1999. Laboratory test procedures for validating the use of thin sprayed-on liners for mesh replacement. Proc. Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum 101st Annual General Meeting, Calgary, Alberta, published on CD-ROM, 1999. 8. pp.         [ Links ]

YILMAZ, H. Shear-bond strength testing of thin spray-on liners. J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall., vol. 107, no. 8. 2007. pp. 519-530.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License