SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.108 número3Computer simulation of air and methane flow following an outburst in transport gallery D-6, bed 409/4 índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados



Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google


Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

versão On-line ISSN 2411-9717
versão impressa ISSN 0038-223X

J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. vol.108 no.3 Johannesburg Mar. 2008




Soil quality as a key success factors in sustainable rehabilitation of kimberlite mine waste



P.W. van DeventerI; A.A. BloemII; J.M. HattinghIII

ISchool of Environmental Sciences and Development, North West University, Potchefstroom Campus, South Africa and Fraser Alexander Tailings
IIDepartment of Agriculture, South Africa
IIICaltech, South Africa




'Soil quality is the capacity of a soil to function, within ecosystem and land use boundaries, to sustain biological productivity, maintain environmental quality, and promote plant, animal and human health'.
In the long-term, vegetative rehabilitation of mining wastes aims at, as far as possible, the proper ecological integration of the reclaimed area into the surrounding landscape, which is sustainable and requires minimal maintenance. A certain succession pattern is therefore needed. Recent ecological concepts recognize the role of the substrate's quality and nutrients in affecting the rates and directions of succession patterns. Although pedogenesis and eventually soil quality in mine waste are not well known, monitoring of soil quality parameters in kimberlite mine tailings reveal a remarkable establishment and or improvement of specific soil quality indicators. During the same time the vegetative cover's total functionality as well as reproductive ability improved.
Functions of soil, and thus soil quality, can be assessed at the field, farm, ecosystem, pedosphere, and global scale. It is recognized, however, that management of soil becomes increasingly difficult at larger scales, but for demarcated mine waste sites it is possible to ameliorate and manage and assess soil functions and quality. Therefore the significance of the study is the following: soil functions and quality become inseparable from the idea of system sustainability, and are considered as key indicators of ecosystem sustainability on rehabilitated mine tailings material.



“Full text available only in PDF format”




ACTON, D.F. and PADBURY, G.A. A conceptual framework for soil quality assessment and monitoring. A program to assess and monitor soil quality in Canada: Soil quality evaluation summary. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ont, Canada. 1993.         [ Links ]

ANDERSON, D.W. and GREGORICH, E.G. Effects of soil erosion on soil quality and productivity. Proceedings of 2nd annual western provincial conference on rationalization of water and soil research and management. Saskatoon, Sask., Canada. 1984.         [ Links ]

BOUMA, J. Using soil survey data for quantitative land evaluation. Adv. Soil Sci, vol. 9. 1989.         [ Links ]

CALLICOTT, J.B. A review of some problems with the concept of ecosystem health. Ecosystem Health, vol. 1. 1995.         [ Links ]

CARTER, M.R. Relative measures of soil bulk density to characterize compaction in tillage studies. Canada J. Soil Sci. vol. 70. 1990.         [ Links ]

DORAN, J.W. and PARKIN, T.B. Defining and assessing soil quality. Soil Sc Soc Am. Special Pub. no. 35, Am Soc Agron., Madison, Wisc., USA 1994.         [ Links ]

DORAN, J.W., SARRANTONIO, M., and LIEBERG, M.A. Soil health and sustainability. Adv Agron. 1996.         [ Links ]

GLOBESCAN. Sustainable development trends: Results of 1995 survey of sustainable agricultural research. Synergistics, Toronto, Ont., Canada. 1996.         [ Links ]

HAMBLIN, A.P. Land quality indicators: when, how and for whom? Ecol. Econ. vol. 12. 1995.         [ Links ]

HORTENSIUS, D. and WELLING, R. International standardization of soil quality measurements. Communications Soil Sci Plant Anal. vol. 27. 1996.         [ Links ]

JANZEN, H.H., LARNEY, F.J., and OLSON, B.M. Soil quality factors of problem soils in Alberta. Proceedings of 29th Annual Alberta Soil Science Workshop, Lethbridge, Alta., Canada. 1992.         [ Links ]

KOOLEN, A.J. Deformation and compaction of elemental soil volumes and effects on mechanical soil properties. Soil Tillage Res. vol. 10. 1987.         [ Links ]

LARSON, W.E. and PIERCE, F.J. The dynamics of soil quality as a measure of sustainable management. Soil Sc Soc Am. Special Pub. no. 35, Am Soc Agron., Madison, Wisc., USA. 1994.         [ Links ]

MILLER, F.P. and WALI, M.K. Soils, land use and sustainable agriculture: a review . Can. J. Soil Sci. vol. 75. 1995.         [ Links ]

PIERCE, F.J. Land Management. The purpose for soil quality assessment. Proceedings of symposium Soil quality for Land Managment: Science, practice and policy. CEM. Univ. of Ballarat, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia. 1996.         [ Links ]

RAPPORT, D.J. Evaluating ecosystem health. J. Ecosystem Health, vol. 1. 1992.         [ Links ]

RICHTER, J. The soil as a reactor. Catena Verlag, Cremlingen, Germany. 1987.         [ Links ]

SMYTH, A.J. and DUMANSKI, J. A framework for evaluating sustainable land management. Can. J. Soil Sci. vol. 75. 1995.         [ Links ]

SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA. Statements on soil quality. Agronomy News, June, 1995.         [ Links ]

WARKENTIN, B.P. The changing concept of soil quality. J. Soil Water Conservation. 1995.         [ Links ]



Paper received Feb. 2007
Revised paper received Oct. 2007

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons