SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.76 issue4Student perceptions of clinical experiences in endodontic access cavity preparationsLichenoid Granulomatous Stomatitis - an oral medicine case book author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


South African Dental Journal

On-line version ISSN 0375-1562
Print version ISSN 0011-8516

S. Afr. dent. j. vol.76 n.4 Johannesburg May. 2021

http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2519-0105/2021/v76no4a7 

RADIOLOGY CASE

 

Maxillofacial Radiology 190

 

 

Jaco Walters

BChD PDD (MFR) PGD (OS) MSc (MFR), Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of the Western Cape, Tygerberg Oral Health Centre, Francie Van Zijl Drive, Cape Town 7505, South Africa. ORCID Number: 0000-0002-0593-6890 Email: jawalters@uwc.ac.za

 

 

The included images depict the most common lesion of odontogenic origin found in the maxillofacial region. What are the important radiological features and what would your provisional diagnosis be?

 

INTERPRETATION

The pantomograph (Figure 1) shows an incidental radio-paque mass in the 3rd quadrant. 3D MIP (Figure 2) and a sagittal CBCT slice (Figure 3) indicates an impaction of the maxillary central incisor. A reconstructed PAN (Figure 4) demonstrates a retained 53. With intraoral radiographs (Figure 5 and 6) demonstrating multiple miniature tooth-like structures. These are characteristic representations of compound odontomas.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In 1866 Broca introduced the French term odontome, which was initially used to refer to all tumours of odonto-genic origin. The English term, odontoma, has subsequently become favoured over the former. Throughout the years' several classifications were presented. In 1971 the WHO defined two types, namely: compound, and complex. Originally known as benign mixed odontogenic tumours. Their tissues and respective cells appear morphologically normal, though lack structural arrangement. This deficiency gave rise to the opinion that they are hamartomatous malformations/lesions rather than true neoplasms.

Their growth potential is more restricted when compared to the complex odontoma. Thought to cease with the end of the tooth forming years. Clinical features are few, which may be limited to a mild firm asymptomatic swelling. Often incidentally discovered during routine radiographic examination or investigation of an unerupted permanent or retained primary tooth. Early lesions appear completely radiolucent. As they mature, internal features range from radiopaque specs to a mass, consisting of a few to several hundred miniature malformed tooth-like structures known as denticles. The encompassing connective tissue capsule appears as a peripheral narrow radiolucent zone, surrounded by a thin sclerotic border similar to a tooth crypt.

More than two-thirds of cases are diagnosed before the age of 20-years-old. Sex predilections are negligible. With a notable preference for the anterior jaws, particularly the maxilla. Treatment consists of conservative enucleation. Sparing adjacent unerupted teeth may be viable based on a favourable prognosis for eruption.

 

References

1. Langlais RP, Langland OE, Nortjé CJ. Diagnostic imaging of the jaws. Williams & Wilkins. 1995.         [ Links ]

2. Reichart P, Philipsen HP. Odontogenic tumors and allied lesions. Quintessence. 2004.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License