SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.6 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


African Human Rights Yearbook

versión On-line ISSN 2663-323X
versión impresa ISSN 2523-1367

Resumen

PRINCE-AGBODJAN, Têtêvi Didier; DONGAR, Bienvenu Criss-Dess  y  AFOGO, Nouwagnon Olivier. The withdrawal of state consent to the optional jurisdiction of the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights: A denial of citizens' right of access to regional justice? A review of the case Glory Cyriaque Hossou and Another v Benin. AHRY [online]. 2022, vol.6, pp.323-342. ISSN 2663-323X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.29053/2523-1367/2022/v6a14.

This commentary reviews the judgment of the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights in Glory Cyriaque Hossou and Another v Benin, concerning the withdrawal of Benin's declaration made under article 34(6) of the African Court's Protocol. The commentary discusses the judgment in the light of the principle of acquired right, a fundamental right to approach the African regional court on human and peoples' rights. In practical terms, it discusses the legal relevance of the state consent rule and its withdrawal under the Protocol. The exercise of the African Court's power to enforce fundamental rights enshrined in the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights and relevant legal instruments or international human rights instruments to which states are parties is subjected to their prior consent pursuant to article 34(6) of the African Court's Protocol. While it is legally permissible for states to accept or not the Court's jurisdiction, the withdrawal of state consent can be questioned due to its adverse effects on the acquired fundamental right to legal remedy recognised by the African Charter. It seems relevant to question the meaning and legal scope of the rule enshrined under article 34(6) of the Protocol. Can an alternative interpretation of the right of the state to withdraw its declaration 34(6) be envisaged, in the name of the effectiveness of continental protection of human rights in Africa?

Palabras clave : Protocole de Ouagadougou; Bénin; retrait de consentement; droits acquis; accès au juge régional; éthique.

        · resumen en Francés     · texto en Francés     · Francés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons