SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.52 número2Critical theory and praxis in post-apartheid South Africa: The case for a critical criminology"These violent delights have violent ends": Good subjects of everyday South African violence índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Acta Academica

versión On-line ISSN 2415-0479
versión impresa ISSN 0587-2405

Resumen

LATECKA, Ewa. Metaphysical guilt: Jaspers, Honneth, and the problem of dehumanisation. Acta acad. (Bloemfontein, Online) [online]. 2020, vol.52, n.2, pp.131-146. ISSN 2415-0479.  http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/24150479/aa52i2/7.

This paper addresses the conditions that need to be met for a human being to feel or, conversely, not to feel guilty of a wrongdoing against another human being. It does this in the light of Jaspers' understanding of metaphysical guilt as arising from inter-human solidarity. My claim is twofold. First, I claim that, while metaphysical guilt is not impossible, Jaspers does not offer an explanation of how it arises either in the Question of German guilt (Jaspers 2000) or in his other work on guilt in general. Secondly, despite metaphysical guilt's existence, it is, nevertheless, common for humans not to experience it, a phenomenon which Jaspers implicitly acknowledges but does not explain explicitly. I apply Axel Honneth's concept of recognition in order to supply the social component and the theory of dehumanisation to explain why, under some circumstances, metaphysical guilt does not arise.

Palabras clave : metaphysical guilt; dehumanisation; recognition; Karl Jaspers; Axel Honneth.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons