SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.52 issue2Critical theory and praxis in post-apartheid South Africa: The case for a critical criminology"These violent delights have violent ends": Good subjects of everyday South African violence author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand



Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google


Acta Academica

On-line version ISSN 2415-0479
Print version ISSN 0587-2405


LATECKA, Ewa. Metaphysical guilt: Jaspers, Honneth, and the problem of dehumanisation. Acta acad. (Bloemfontein, Online) [online]. 2020, vol.52, n.2, pp.131-146. ISSN 2415-0479.

This paper addresses the conditions that need to be met for a human being to feel or, conversely, not to feel guilty of a wrongdoing against another human being. It does this in the light of Jaspers' understanding of metaphysical guilt as arising from inter-human solidarity. My claim is twofold. First, I claim that, while metaphysical guilt is not impossible, Jaspers does not offer an explanation of how it arises either in the Question of German guilt (Jaspers 2000) or in his other work on guilt in general. Secondly, despite metaphysical guilt's existence, it is, nevertheless, common for humans not to experience it, a phenomenon which Jaspers implicitly acknowledges but does not explain explicitly. I apply Axel Honneth's concept of recognition in order to supply the social component and the theory of dehumanisation to explain why, under some circumstances, metaphysical guilt does not arise.

Keywords : metaphysical guilt; dehumanisation; recognition; Karl Jaspers; Axel Honneth.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )


Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License