SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11 issue1Phonological awareness and speech perception: Skills of Grade 1 English second language learnersStudent perceptions of multilingualism and the culture of communication in journalism studies in higher education author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Reading & Writing

On-line version ISSN 2308-1422
Print version ISSN 2079-8245

Abstract

DE LANGE, Maryna M.; WINBERG, Christine  and  DIPPENAAR, Hanlie. Why the English Home Language Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement will not improve learners' reading comprehension. Reading & Writing [online]. 2020, vol.11, n.1, pp.1-9. ISSN 2308-1422.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/rw.v11i1.260.

BACKGROUND: The Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS), and similar international assessments, have consistently shown South African intermediate phase learners' performance to be among the lowest worldwide. Of particular concern is the Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) for Home Language in the Intermediate Phase and, specifically, the document's treatment of the assessment of reading comprehensionOBJECTIVES: In this study, the CAPS requirements for assessing reading comprehension were examined, with the aim of laying the groundwork for an improved policy frameworkMETHOD: The research design of the study involved evaluating the assessment of reading comprehension in the CAPS document, using a social realist approach to uncover its underlying structures and mechanismsRESULTS: The study found that a principled approach to the assessment of reading comprehension was lacking, which had a cumulative effect across the CAPS document, resulting in random, yet highly prescriptive, requirementsCONCLUSION: The study concluded that CAPS does not provide adequate guidance for improving reading comprehension and, moreover, that the prescribed programme of assessment is not supported by the research literature on reading comprehension. The study recommends that better, more evidence-informed and consultative policies and guidelines be introduced to support teachers in the assessment - and, ultimately, the improvement - of intermediate phase learners' reading comprehension

Keywords : reading comprehension; Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS); Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS); home language; intermediate phase; assessment.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License