SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.85 issue1Novice Teachers' Beliefs and Fears on Bullying in Schools in South AfricaPower and Influence: Assessing the Conceptual Relationship author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Koers

On-line version ISSN 2304-8557
Print version ISSN 0023-270X

Abstract

NYMAN, Bill. Francis Schaeffer's Relevance to Contemporary Apologetics. Koers (Online) [online]. 2020, vol.85, n.1, pp.1-18. ISSN 2304-8557.  http://dx.doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.85.1.2468.

Thirty-five years have elapsed since the passing of evangelist/apologist Francis Schaeffer He has been criticized by many but lauded by more. He was one who could not escape the ire of his own son, but one thing remains true: he has touched more people than one could count His legacy as a gentleman evangelist remains and a number of aspects used in his apologetics approach that came so naturally for Schaeffer can not be emulated even three and a half decades after his death. The context in which Schaeffer taught and lived in the tumultuous sixties and seventies were not so different than the context in which we live today Culture has largely abandoned Christianity and hedonism is one of the hallmarks of (post)modern culture We might find a resurgence of spirituality in the twenty-first century but we discover that this spirituality is largely based on personal experience and preference. We are called to confront this culture that has abandoned the truth and is steeped in a materialism and consumerism that have somehow been made part and parcel of the spiritual experience of those living in the twenty-first century. In this regard, in order to be most effective, our apologetic task must be biblical, reasonable, relational, conversational and incarnational.

Keywords : Apologetics; incarnational; postmodern; reason; Francis Schaeffer; fundamentalism; worldview.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License