SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.54 número1The dissolution of universal partnerships in South African law: Lessons to be learnt from Botswana, Zimbabwe and NamibiaRe-visiting the powers of the King under the Constitution of Lesotho: Does he still have any discretion? índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


De Jure Law Journal

versão On-line ISSN 2225-7160
versão impressa ISSN 1466-3597

Resumo

NJOKO, Thulisile Brenda. The admissibility of criminal findings in civil matters: Re-evaluating the Hollington judgment. De Jure (Pretoria) [online]. 2021, vol.54, n.1, pp.160-173. ISSN 2225-7160.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2021/v54a10.

In Hollington v Hewthorn & Co Ltd 2 1943 All ER 35 it was held that a finding of a criminal court did not have any probative value in a subsequent civil action and was inadmissible as evidence. Despite the case being one of English origin, the South African courts have largely adopted this ruling as one grounded in our common law. In this paper, the judgment in the Hollington case is critically analysed in order to determine its continued applicability in the face of South Africa's existing law of evidence and the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 ("the Constitution"). It is argued that in light of the existing law, this rule no longer finds application in South Africa.

        · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons