SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.54 issue1The dissolution of universal partnerships in South African law: Lessons to be learnt from Botswana, Zimbabwe and NamibiaRe-visiting the powers of the King under the Constitution of Lesotho: Does he still have any discretion? author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


De Jure Law Journal

On-line version ISSN 2225-7160
Print version ISSN 1466-3597

Abstract

NJOKO, Thulisile Brenda. The admissibility of criminal findings in civil matters: Re-evaluating the Hollington judgment. De Jure (Pretoria) [online]. 2021, vol.54, n.1, pp.160-173. ISSN 2225-7160.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2021/v54a10.

In Hollington v Hewthorn & Co Ltd 2 1943 All ER 35 it was held that a finding of a criminal court did not have any probative value in a subsequent civil action and was inadmissible as evidence. Despite the case being one of English origin, the South African courts have largely adopted this ruling as one grounded in our common law. In this paper, the judgment in the Hollington case is critically analysed in order to determine its continued applicability in the face of South Africa's existing law of evidence and the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 ("the Constitution"). It is argued that in light of the existing law, this rule no longer finds application in South Africa.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License