SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.54 número1Giant leaps or baby steps? A preliminary review of the development of children's rights jurisprudence in Zimbabwe índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


De Jure Law Journal

versión On-line ISSN 2225-7160
versión impresa ISSN 1466-3597

Resumen

BRINK, Gustav Francois. On "Dumping" and the Competition Act of South Africa: No "double remedy". De Jure (Pretoria) [online]. 2021, vol.54, n.1, pp.1-15. ISSN 2225-7160.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2021/v54a1.

In "'Dumping' and the Competition Act of South Africa", Vinti espouses that the Competition Commission has jurisdiction over the actions of extra-territorial parties insofar as such actions involve "prohibited price discrimination" or "price dumping". He finds that the Competition Act and the International Trade Administration Act both bestow jurisdiction over the matter and hence argues that this would constitute an unfair double remedy if both authorities were to take action. He therefore proposes, on the basis of a Memorandum of Agreement that has been concluded between the Competition Commission and the International Trade Administration Commission, that either of the Acts should be amended to ensure that no such double remedies are imposed. Although it is agreed that such "double remedy", if applied, would indeed be unfair for several reasons, this article argues that no such double remedy exists and that, despite the provisions of the Competition Act, the Competition Commission has no jurisdiction in matters related to dumping.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons