Abstract

BRINK, Gustav Francois. On "Dumping" and the Competition Act of South Africa: No "double remedy". De Jure (Pretoria) [online]. 2021, vol.54, n.1, pp.1-15. ISSN 2225-7160.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2021/v54a1.

In "'Dumping' and the Competition Act of South Africa", Vinti espouses that the Competition Commission has jurisdiction over the actions of extra-territorial parties insofar as such actions involve "prohibited price discrimination" or "price dumping". He finds that the Competition Act and the International Trade Administration Act both bestow jurisdiction over the matter and hence argues that this would constitute an unfair double remedy if both authorities were to take action. He therefore proposes, on the basis of a Memorandum of Agreement that has been concluded between the Competition Commission and the International Trade Administration Commission, that either of the Acts should be amended to ensure that no such double remedies are imposed. Although it is agreed that such "double remedy", if applied, would indeed be unfair for several reasons, this article argues that no such double remedy exists and that, despite the provisions of the Competition Act, the Competition Commission has no jurisdiction in matters related to dumping.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )