SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.53 issue1"We'll fight this little struggle": alleviating hunger in South AfricaDiscussing the fundamental principles inherent to effective systems of caregiving leave author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


De Jure Law Journal

On-line version ISSN 2225-7160
Print version ISSN 1466-3597

Abstract

VINTI, Clive. Regulation 22 of the Amended Tariff Investigations Regulations and the right to "procedural fairness". De Jure (Pretoria) [online]. 2020, vol.53, n.1, pp.212-228. ISSN 2225-7160.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2020/v53a15.

Regulation 22 of the Amended Tariff Investigations Regulations (ATR) permits the International Trade Administration Commission (ITAC) to submit to the Minister of Trade and Industry, a "final finding" that consists of a recommendation to either approve or reject an application for a tariff amendment and a Ministerial Minute or a report explaining the reasons for ITAC's evaluation. The Minister of Trade and Industry can then decide to either approve or reject ITAC's recommendation. However, Regulation 22 of the ATR does not avail the affected parties any notice of the nature and purpose of this "proposed administrative action" nor a "reasonable opportunity to make representations" on it. Consequently, the object of this paper is to assess whether Regulation 22 complies with the right to "procedural fairness" in the manner contemplated by section 3 of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License