SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.53 issue1The use of impact statements, minimum sentences and victims' privacy interests: a therapeutic explorationThe implementation of customary law of succession and common law of succession respectively: With a specific focus on the eradication of the rule of male primogeniture author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


De Jure Law Journal

On-line version ISSN 2225-7160
Print version ISSN 1466-3597

Abstract

HAMMAN, Abraham  and  KOEN, Raymond. Carpe Pecuniam: Criminal forfeiture of tainted legal fees. De Jure (Pretoria) [online]. 2020, vol.53, n.1, pp.19-35. ISSN 2225-7160.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2020/v53a2.

A person charged with money laundering has a right to legal representation and a lawyer is entitled to defend such person. What if the lawyer is paid with dirty money? This paper explores the legal status of tainted fees, to determine whether such moneys should be forfeitable and, if so, what forfeiture means for the client's right to legal representation and the lawyer's right to practise his\her profession. This is an issue of international import and the paper considers criminal forfeiture of tainted legal fees in South Africa, the USA and Canada. All three jurisdictions provide for the criminalisation of tainted fees. However, South African lawyers are most in peril both of prosecution and conviction for accepting tainted fees and of having such fees confiscated. Whereas the USA and Canada uphold the right of lawyers to practise their profession, South Africa appears to negate it. The South African position requires reform.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License