SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.52 special issue author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


De Jure Law Journal

On-line version ISSN 2225-7160
Print version ISSN 1466-3597

Abstract

VOHITO, Sonia. Using the courts to end corporal punishment — The international score card. De Jure (Pretoria) [online]. 2019, vol.52, n.spe, pp.597-609. ISSN 2225-7160.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2019/v52a34.

Corporal punishment of children breaches their rights to respect for human dignity and physical integrity and to equal protection under the law. There are a number of rulings and statements by national high-level courts concerning corporal punishment, its constitutionality and/or its non-compliance with international human rights treaties. The majority of these cases clearly condemn corporal punishment in one or more settings. In many cases, the rulings have been followed by law reform to ensure that national legislation prohibits corporal punishment. This article focuses on ten national high-level courts judgments and their impacts on achieving prohibition of corporal punishment of children in one or more settings. It highlights high-level court judgments clearly condemning corporal punishment of children (Bangladesh, Costa Rica, Fiji, India, Israel, Italy and Nepal), as well as judgments, which did not clearly condemn corporal punishment -(Canada, Kenya and Tonga) but had an impact on the legality of corporal punishment in the concerned countries. An analysis of the selected cases reveals that in addition to lobbying governments to achieve law reform, civil society organisations are increasingly promoting prohibition of corporal punishment by challenging the legality of corporal punishment in court. The article also finds judgments of high-level courts can trigger changes in the general perception of the protection and promotion of human rights. In some cases, judges have ruled against the legal defence of "reasonable chastisement" and clearly condemned the use of corporal punishment by parents and caregivers in private spheres. The article concludes on the need for considering strategic litigation as an alternative way of achieving prohibition of corporal punishment.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License