Abstract

GOMEZ, R.; CASTRO, R.; BETANCOURT, F.  and  MONCADA, M.. Comparison of normalized and non-normalized block caving comminution models. J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. [online]. 2021, vol.121, n.11, pp.581-588. ISSN 2411-9717.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/1150/2021.

In block cave mining, rock fragmentation is a key parameter that influences the production level design and mine planning. Fragmentation occurs mainly by natural breakage during the caving process and in the draw column. The breakage that occurs within the column is known as secondary fragmentation. Secondary fragmentation has been successfully described using the block caving comminution model, which replicates the fragmentation mechanics between particles under drawn and vertical loads in a draw column. This model is based on a kinetic and population balance approach, in which non-normalized and normalized assumptions can be used depending on material and comminution system behaviour. In this paper, the non-normalized and normalized approaches are applied and compared to laboratory data to determine which assumption should be used for secondary breakage in block caving. Approaches are compared graphically, with the mean square error and the Fisher test with a false-rejection probability of 0.05. Based on a statistical analysis, the results show that the normalized model can be applied to all the rock types tested.

Keywords : block caving; breakage; comminution; mass balance; secondary fragmentation; modelling.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )