SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11 número1Serological detection of brucellosis among febrile, malaria-negative children and domesticated dogs in an urban African settingPostmortem diagnosis of COVID-19: Antemortem challenges of three cases at the 37 Military Hospital, Accra, Ghana índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


African Journal of Laboratory Medicine

versión On-line ISSN 2225-2010
versión impresa ISSN 2225-2002

Resumen

VAN HEERDEN, Marli; GEORGE, Jaya A.  y  KHOZA, Siyabonga. The application of sigma metrics in the laboratory to assess quality control processes in South Africa. Afr. J. Lab. Med. [online]. 2022, vol.11, n.1, pp.1-7. ISSN 2225-2010.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1344.

BACKGROUND: Laboratories use quality control processes to monitor and evaluate analytical performance in terms of precision and bias. Sigma metrics provide an objective assessment of laboratory quality using the total allowable error as an additional parameter OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the sigma metrics of analytes when using different total allowable error guidelines. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 19 general chemistry analytes at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital in South Africa between January 2017 and December 2017. Sigma metrics were calculated on two identical analysers, using internal quality control data and total allowable error guidelines from the Ricos biological variation database and three alternative sources (the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia, the Clinical Laboratory Improvements Amendment, and the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. RESULTS: The sigma performance was similar on both analysers but varied based on the guideline used, with the Clinical Laboratory Improvements Amendment guidelines resulting in the best sigma metrics (53% of analytes on one analyser and 46% on the other had acceptable sigma metrics) and the Royal College of Pathologists of Australia guidelines being the most stringent (21% and 23%). Sodium and chloride performed poorly across all guidelines (sigma < 3). There were also month-to-month variations that may result in acceptable sigma despite poor performance during certain months. CONCLUSION: The sigma varies greatly depending on the total allowable error, but could be a valuable tool to save time and decrease costs in high-volume laboratories. Sigma metrics calculations need to be standardised.

Palabras clave : quality control; diagnostic errors; laboratories; clinical chemistry tests; sigma metrics; Six Sigma; chemical pathology.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons