SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.7 issue1Low-cost diagnostic test for susceptible and drug-resistant tuberculosis in rural MalawiHuman parvovirus B19-induced anaemia in pre-school children in Ilorin, Nigeria author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


African Journal of Laboratory Medicine

On-line version ISSN 2225-2010
Print version ISSN 2225-2002

Abstract

COETZEE, Lindi-Marie; CASSIM, Naseem  and  GLENCROSS, Deborah K.. Using laboratory data to categorise CD4 laboratory turn-around-time performance across a national programme. Afr. J. Lab. Med. [online]. 2018, vol.7, n.1, pp.1-7. ISSN 2225-2010.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v7i1.665.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The National Health Laboratory Service provides CD4 testing through an integrated tiered service delivery model with a target laboratory turn-around time (TAT) of 48 h. Mean TAT provides insight into national CD4 laboratory performance. However, it is not sensitive enough to identify inefficiencies of outlying laboratories or predict the percentage of samples meeting the TAT target. The aim of this study was to describe the use of the median, 75th percentile and percentage within target of laboratory TAT data to categorise laboratory performance. METHODS: Retrospective CD4 laboratory data for 2015-2016 fiscal year were extracted from the corporate data warehouse. The laboratory TAT distribution and percentage of samples within the 48 h target were assessed. A scatter plot was used to categorise laboratory performance into four quadrants using both the percentage within target and 75th percentile TAT. The laboratory performance was labelled good, satisfactory or poor. RESULTS: TAT data reported a positive skew with a mode of 13 h and a median of 17 h and 75th percentile of 25 h. Overall, 93.2% of CD4 samples had a laboratory TAT of less than 48 h. 48 out of 52 laboratories reported good TAT performance, i.e. percentage within target > 85% and 75th percentile ≤ 48 h, with two categorised as satisfactory (one parameter met), and two as poor performing laboratories (failed both parameters). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the feasibility of utilising laboratory data to categorise laboratory performance. Using the quadrant approach for TAT data, laboratories that need interventions can be highlighted for root cause analysis assessment.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License