SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 issue3The state of the art of gendered energy innovations: a structured literature reviewNature-inspired leadership - Seeking human-technology-earth harmony author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


South African Journal of Industrial Engineering

On-line version ISSN 2224-7890
Print version ISSN 1012-277X

Abstract

PANCHA, U.B.  and  DEWA, M.. Deployment of the analytic hierarchical process for comparative analysis of additive manufacturing technologies in the manufacture of injection moulds. S. Afr. J. Ind. Eng. [online]. 2022, vol.33, n.3, pp.190-203. ISSN 2224-7890.  http://dx.doi.org/10.7166/33-3-2796.

The current environment of changing market trends drives the manufacturing industry to strive for efficient manufacturing technologies. A mould manufacturer was using traditional manufacturing approaches to fabricate injection moulds. The traditional approach compromised the competitiveness of the organisation, resulting in a lower production rate and high operational costs owing to lengthy changeover times. Given several alternatives, the aim of this study was to determine the best suitable additive manufacturing technology for the manufacture of moulds. The analytic hierarchical process was deployed as the method to compare and select the best 3D printing technology from among recent additive manufacturing (AM) technologies that would meet surface finish, dimensional accuracy, cost, and manufacturing lead time requirements. Four AM options were multilevel concurrent printing, MELD technology, a Metal Jet 3D printer, and VELO3D. The final results indicated that the VELO3D was better than the other additive manufacturing technologies for the manufacture of moulds.

        · abstract in Afrikaans     · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License