SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.28 issue1Two-commodity perishable inventory system with bulk demand for one commodityQuality performance: The case of construction projects in the electricity industry in Kenya author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


South African Journal of Industrial Engineering

On-line version ISSN 2224-7890
Print version ISSN 1012-277X

Abstract

SIMONS, R.C.; BESTER, A.  and  MOLL, M.. Exploring variability among quality management system auditors when rating the severity of audit findings at a nuclear power plant. S. Afr. J. Ind. Eng. [online]. 2017, vol.28, n.1, pp.145-163. ISSN 2224-7890.  http://dx.doi.org/10.7166/28-1-1512.

A reliable quality assurance (QA) function in the nuclear environment is underpinned by the effective identification of risk, and by effective decision-making processes in relation to the risk identified. The need for competent auditors who are able to remain objective and independent at all times forms a critical component of this process. This exploratory study sought to determine reasons for the noted inconsistency among auditors when rating the severity of audit findings, and to provide recommendations to reduce this variability. The Delphi technique, a structured process to gather information from a panel of experts, was adopted to enable multiple iterations of qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis, in an attempt to mimic the elements of a sequential exploratory strategy related to a mixed method methodology.

        · abstract in Afrikaans     · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License