Services on Demand
Article
Indicators
Related links
- Cited by Google
- Similars in Google
Share
Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus (SPiL Plus)
On-line version ISSN 2224-3380
Print version ISSN 1726-541X
Abstract
BABCOCK, Rebecca Day; DEAN, Aliethia; HINESLY, Victoria and TAFT, Aileen. Evaluating the Synthesis Model of tutoring across the educational spectrum. SPiL plus (Online) [online]. 2019, vol.57, pp.57-77. ISSN 2224-3380. http://dx.doi.org/10.5842/57-0-810.
The goal of this study is to verify a grounded theory model of tutoring developed by Babcock, Manning and Rogers (2012) using qualitative research literature as data. The four participants in the current study (three females) were recruited using a convenience sample as they were current or former tutees of the authors. One participant was a middle-school student while the others were college students. To obtain data, participants were tutored by the researchers either online (asynchronously) or face-to-face. Researchers coded the data based on audio recordings of face-to-face sessions and written artefacts of online tutoring sessions. The results support the model developed by Babcock et al. (2012). It is important to verify the grounded theory model since it will close the circle with grounded theory research to apply it to authentic tutoring data. Researchers have proposed grounded theory in tutoring but no one has yet attempted to verify a model. While the original model covered extensive topics such as communication, personal characteristics, outside influences, emotions, temperament, and outcomes, in this brief report we focus mainly on personal characteristics and outside influences. The model fits the data except in the case of asynchronous online tutoring, likely because the original data was from 1983 to 2006 and did not cover much online tutoring.
Keywords : tutoring; tutoring model; grounded theory; asynchronous tutoring; online tutoring.