SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.9 issue1Accelerating mathematics word problem-solving performance and efficacy with think-aloud strategiesFormative assessment as 'formative pedagogy' in Grade 3 mathematics author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


South African Journal of Childhood Education

On-line version ISSN 2223-7682
Print version ISSN 2223-7674

Abstract

RUDOLPH, Norma; MILLEI, Zsuzsanna  and  ALASUUTARI, Maarit. Data practices and inequality in South African early childhood development policy: Technocratic management versus social transformation. SAJCE [online]. 2019, vol.9, n.1, pp.1-11. ISSN 2223-7682.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v9i1.756.

BACKGROUND: In 1994, the African National Congress identified early childhood development as a potential strategy to redress the inequalities of apartheid, however, two and a half decades later, poverty still persists, and South Africa is one of the most unequal countries in the world. AIM: This article explores how policy texts based on and with the use of certain data practices establish 'truths' about childhoods and society, construct families and communities, and determine forms of provision to address inequality. SETTING: In 2015, the South African government published the National Integrated Early Childhood Policy (NIECDP) to continue to address poverty and inequality. Its implementation increasingly draws on data practices that measure and inform solutions. The use of data practices, while also providing needed information, prioritises solutions that proceed in technocratic ways instead of facilitating social change. METHODS: With a critical discourse analysis of policy texts and the introduction of alternatives, the analysis seeks to highlight the power and knowledge hierarchies that construct the policies of NIECDP. RESULTS: This article demonstrates how discourses and data practices prioritise 'the government of poverty' instead of helping to eliminate it and silence the voices of those living with poverty. This form of government through data also undermines the policy's potential to respond to the different life chances resulting from the diverse conditions in which young children live in South Africa. CONCLUSION: This article seeks to re-open a debate that the NIECDP successfully silenced, specifically who benefits, who speaks and who is silenced.

Keywords : data practices; policy analysis; South Africa; early childhood; social justice.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License