SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.23 número1A critical analysis of the foreign services reportable arrangement provision of the Tax Administration Act of South AfricaThe significance of performance appraisal for innovation, in selected South African organisations índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados



Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google


South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences

versão On-line ISSN 2222-3436
versão impressa ISSN 1015-8812


KHONJELWAYO, Bongani  e  NTHAKHENI, Thilivhali. Investment in electricity distribution capital infrastructure in South Africa: The role of regulation. S. Afr. j. econ. manag. sci. [online]. 2020, vol.23, n.1, pp.1-10. ISSN 2222-3436.

BACKGROUND: The electricity distribution industry in South Africa is faced with numerous challenges that include distribution capacity shortages and backlog in investments AIM: This study was carried out to investigate the role of regulation in enabling investment in distribution capital expenditure SETTING: The study focusses on the licensed electricity distributors and the energy regulation institution in South Africa METHODS: Primary data for the study was collected through interviews with 16 Energy Regulator officials responsible for analysing and approving electricity distributor tariff applications. Secondary data was collected and analysed through a sample of 112 electricity distributors in South Africa RESULTS: It is established that the National Energy Regulator of South Africa has put a number of processes and methods in place to ensure that electricity distributors (EDs) are efficient in their operations and that the tariffs they charge customers are not excessive and are aligned to specific benchmarks as approved by the regulator. However, a majority of EDs are not performing according to the benchmarks. For instance, they are operating at a negative surplus, which does not allow them to make sufficient investment in infrastructure refurbishment and acquire new infrastructure. The study also discovered that EDs are spending the minimum 6% required by regulation on repairs and maintenance CONCLUSION: The conclusion of the study is that in the absence of a regulatory methodology that allows EDs to earn a required return on assets, benchmarks play a big role in ensuring that they are performing at the level required and that through the surpluses they generate, they can invest in the acquisition of new infrastructure for capital gain. However, regulation alone is not sufficient to ensure that capital investment is adequate; government intervention through infrastructure grants is also necessary and a private sector capital injection

Palavras-chave : Capital expenditure; electricity distributors; infrastructure backlogs; regulation; benchmarks; repairs and maintenance and infrastructure capital.

        · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )


Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons