SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.65 issue1 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


South African Family Practice

On-line version ISSN 2078-6204
Print version ISSN 2078-6190

Abstract

PREMSAGAR, Preesha; ALDOUS, Colleen  and  ESTERHUIZEN, Tonya. Cardiac scoring systems, coronary artery disease and major adverse cardiovascular events: A scoping review. SAFP [online]. 2023, vol.65, n.1, pp.1-8. ISSN 2078-6204.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v65i1.5683.

BACKGROUND: In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared coronary artery disease (CAD) as the leading cause of death globally for the last 20 years. Early screening and detection (primary prevention) and intervention (secondary prevention) are necessary to curb CAD and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) prevalence. A scoping review to assess the current literature on using cardiac scoring systems to predict CAD and MACE was performed METHODS: The research question 'What is the literature on using cardiac scoring systems to predict CAD and MACE?' was addressed. The updated Arksey and O'Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews methodologies were used. The search terms 'coronary artery disease' and 'cardiac scoring systems' and 'major adverse cardiovascular events' were used in the Boolean search on PubMed, ScienceDirect, MedLine and Cochrane Library RESULTS: The final list consisted of 19 published English results after the year 2000. There were six results without participants (four clinical guidelines, one review article and one ongoing clinical trial). Scoring systems were cardiovascular risk estimation systems focusing on the primary prevention of CAD; MACE was discussed but not scored. There were 13 robust results published from completed multinational clinical trials with participants. These results focused on a scoring system for the secondary prevention of CAD and MACE CONCLUSION: Scoring systems remain an objective method for primary and secondary prevention of CAD and MACE CONTRIBUTION: Scoring systems may be helpful with clinical uncertainty or to standardise patient results for comparison in research

Keywords : scoping review; coronary artery disease CAD; cardiac scoring systems; major adverse cardiovascular events MACE.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License