SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.28Maternal and neonatal factors associated with perinatal deaths in a South African healthcare institution índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Health SA Gesondheid (Online)

versão On-line ISSN 2071-9736
versão impressa ISSN 1025-9848

Resumo

RIKHOTSO, Oscar; MORODI, Thabiso J.  e  MASEKAMENI, Daniel M.. Noise risk assessments within the adequately controlled and reasonably practicable philosophies. Health SA Gesondheid (Online) [online]. 2023, vol.28, pp.1-9. ISSN 2071-9736.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v28i0.2457.

BACKGROUND: The entire risk assessment process is fraught with methodological and technical uncertainties, exacerbated by the introduction in legislation of ambiguous technical terms such as adequately controlled and reasonably practicable. The combination of these factors renders the risk assessment process opaque regarding required employer actions for securing legal compliance within the noise risk assessment context AIM: This study aims to evaluate how companies are applying and interpreting the adequately controlled and reasonably practicable philosophies within the context of hearing conservation programmes (HCPs) and noise risk assessment processes SETTING: Four manufacturing and utilities companies METHODS: The four companies, selected through convenience sampling, submitted noise risk assessment records for evaluation through document analysis to determine the companies' interpretation of the adequately controlled and reasonably practicable philosophies RESULTS: In the reviewed noise risk assessment records, the adequately controlled and reasonably practicable philosophies were poorly discerned. Specifically, the hierarchical approach for noise control outlined in the noise induced hearing loss regulations, for which the basis for adequately controlled philosophy ensues, remains misinterpreted by employers. Furthermore, cost-benefit analysis, which enables decision-making on the tolerability of risk within the reasonably practicable philosophy, was also omitted in the assessments CONCLUSION: The adequately controlled and reasonably practicable philosophies were poorly applied and interpreted by the participating companies, to the detriment of tangible noise control CONTRIBUTION: This study provides insights on company application and interpretation of the adequately controlled and reasonably practicable philosophies, and HCPs, which contributes to inaction on noise control

Palavras-chave : administrative control; engineering control; cost-benefit analysis; precautionary principle; noise control; noise-induced hearing loss; occupational health and safety.

        · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons