SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.15 número1Exploring gaps, strategies and solutions for primary care research mentorship in the African context: A workshop reportPredictors of family functionality amongst human immunodeficiency virus-serodiscordant couples in two major hospitals in Kumasi, Ghana índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine

versión On-line ISSN 2071-2936
versión impresa ISSN 2071-2928

Resumen

ABRAHAMS, Tracey-Leigh; PATHER, Michael K.  y  SWARTZ, Steve. Knowledge, beliefs and practices of nurses with long-acting reversible contraception, Cape Town. Afr. j. prim. health care fam. med. (Online) [online]. 2023, vol.15, n.1, pp.1-8. ISSN 2071-2936.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v15i1.3571.

BACKGROUND: Implanon and copper intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) are long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) available in public primary health care (PHC) South Africa. These methods are the most effective forms of contraception. AIM: To evaluate the knowledge, beliefs and practices on provision of LARC. SETTING: Primary health care facilities within the Khayelitsha Eastern Substructure, Cape Town. METHODS: A descriptive survey of all permanent nurses who provided contraception. Data were collected from 72/90 (80% response rate) via a validated questionnaire and evaluated using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). RESULTS: Knowledge of eligibility for LARC was tested. The mean knowledge scores for Implanon were 8.56/11 (s.d. 1.42) for the trained and 7.16/11 (s.d. 2.83) for the untrained (p = 0.007). The mean knowledge scores for IUCD were 10.42/12 (s.d. 1.80) for the trained and 8.03/12 (s.d. 3.70) for the untrained (p = 0.019). Participants believed that inaccessibility to training courses (29%), no skilled person available (24%) and staff shortages (35%) were barriers. Less than 50% of women were routinely counselled for LARC. Forty-one percent of nurses were trained and performed IUCD insertion, and 64% were trained and performed Implanon insertion, while 61% and 45% required further training. Confidence was low, with 32% trained and confident in IUCD and 56% trained and confident in Implanon insertion. CONCLUSION: Lack of training, poor confidence and deficient counselling skills were barriers to effective LARC provision. The identified system-specific barriers must be addressed to improve uptake. CONTRIBUTION: The first study to evaluate knowledge, beliefs and practices on LARC in providers in the Western Cape.

Palabras clave : long-acting reversible contraception; primary health care; intrauterine contraceptive device; Implanon; intrauterine contraceptive device.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons