SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.15 issue1Measuring the quality of primary care in national health surveys: Lessons from BrazilLevels of health literacy and English comprehension in patients presenting to South African primary healthcare facilities author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine

On-line version ISSN 2071-2936
Print version ISSN 2071-2928

Abstract

MATLALA, Mafora F.; LUBBE, Martha S.  and  STEYN, Hanlie. The completeness of adverse drug reaction reports in South Africa: An analysis in VigiBase®. Afr. j. prim. health care fam. med. (Online) [online]. 2023, vol.15, n.1, pp.1-9. ISSN 2071-2936.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/PHCFM.V15I1.3659.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous reporting is regarded as a cornerstone of pharmacovigilance (PV) but presents many limitations, including varying quality and completeness of information, which is essential for causality assessment AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the completeness of adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports in South Africa based on the vigiGrade completeness score SETTING: The South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA METHODS: A cross-sectional, descriptive study of all reports received by SAHPRA and submitted to VigiBase® in 2017 was conducted. A report with a vigiGrade score > 0.8 is considered well-documented RESULTS: The mean completeness score for the 8438 reports received was 0.456 (s.d. = 0.221). Only 11.3% of reports had a completeness score > 0.8. The completeness of reports submitted by consumers professionals did not significantly differ from reports by physicians, pharmacists or other healthcare professionals (d ≤ 0.2). Reports of reactions that resulted in death (M = 0.572, s.e. = 0.007), disability (M = 0.491, s.e. 0.033) or were life threatening (M = 0.474, s.e. = 0.013) had a medium to large practically significant effect (0.5 ≥ d ≤ 0.8) on the completeness score compared with reports of congenital anomaly (M = 0.348, s.e. = 0.089 CONCLUSION: The completeness of reports submitted by consumers is comparable to those submitted by healthcare professionals. The completeness of reports was low and multiple measures to improve reporting are recommended CONTRIBUTION: This study describes the completeness of ADR reports in South Africa and the results can be used to improve training

Keywords : pharmacovigilance; adverse drug reactions; reports; completeness; South Africa; individual case safety report.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License