SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 número1Reform and Performance of the Provincial Health Inspectorate and the Provincial Division of Health of South Kivu in the Democratic Republic of Congo índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine

versión On-line ISSN 2071-2936
versión impresa ISSN 2071-2928

Resumen

ERUMEDA, Neetha J.; GEORGE, Ann Z.  y  JENKINS, Louis S.. Evaluating postgraduate family medicine supervisor feedback in registrars' learning portfolios. Afr. j. prim. health care fam. med. (Online) [online]. 2022, vol.14, n.1, pp.1-10. ISSN 2071-2936.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v14i1.3744.

BACKGROUND: Postgraduate supervision forms a vital component of decentralised family medicine training. While the components of effective supervisory feedback have been explored in high-income countries, how this construct is delivered in resource-constrained low- to middle-income countries has not been investigated adequately. AIM: This article evaluated supervisory feedback in family medicine registrars' learning portfolios (LPs) as captured in their learning plans and mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) forms and whether the training district or the year of training affected the nature of the feedback. SETTING: Registrars' LPs from 2020 across five decentralised sites affiliated with the University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa were analysed. METHODS: Two modified tools were used to evaluate the quantity of the written feedback in 38 learning plans and 57 mini-CEX forms. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for analysis. Content analysis was used to derive counts of areas of feedback. RESULTS: Most learning plans (61.2%) did not refer to registrars' clinical knowledge or offer an improvement strategy (86.1%). The 'extent of supervisors' feedback' was rated as 'poor' (63.2%), with only 14.0% rated as 'good.' The 'some' and 'no' feedback categories in the mini-CEX competencies (p < 0.001 to p = 0.014) and the 'extent of supervisors' feedback' (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with training district. Feedback focused less on clinical reasoning and negotiation skills. CONCLUSION: Supervisors should provide specific and constructive narrative feedback and an action plan to improve registrars' future performance. CONTRIBUTION: Supervisory feedback in postgraduate family medicine training needs overall improvement to develop skilled family physicians.

Palabras clave : decentralised training; family physician; feedback; individualised learning plan; learning portfolio; postgraduate supervision; mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons