Services on Demand
Article
Indicators
Related links
- Cited by Google
- Similars in Google
Share
African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine
On-line version ISSN 2071-2936
Print version ISSN 2071-2928
Abstract
ERUMEDA, Neetha J.; GEORGE, Ann Z. and JENKINS, Louis S.. Evaluating postgraduate family medicine supervisor feedback in registrars' learning portfolios. Afr. j. prim. health care fam. med. (Online) [online]. 2022, vol.14, n.1, pp.1-10. ISSN 2071-2936. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v14i1.3744.
BACKGROUND: Postgraduate supervision forms a vital component of decentralised family medicine training. While the components of effective supervisory feedback have been explored in high-income countries, how this construct is delivered in resource-constrained low- to middle-income countries has not been investigated adequately. AIM: This article evaluated supervisory feedback in family medicine registrars' learning portfolios (LPs) as captured in their learning plans and mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) forms and whether the training district or the year of training affected the nature of the feedback. SETTING: Registrars' LPs from 2020 across five decentralised sites affiliated with the University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa were analysed. METHODS: Two modified tools were used to evaluate the quantity of the written feedback in 38 learning plans and 57 mini-CEX forms. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for analysis. Content analysis was used to derive counts of areas of feedback. RESULTS: Most learning plans (61.2%) did not refer to registrars' clinical knowledge or offer an improvement strategy (86.1%). The 'extent of supervisors' feedback' was rated as 'poor' (63.2%), with only 14.0% rated as 'good.' The 'some' and 'no' feedback categories in the mini-CEX competencies (p < 0.001 to p = 0.014) and the 'extent of supervisors' feedback' (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with training district. Feedback focused less on clinical reasoning and negotiation skills. CONCLUSION: Supervisors should provide specific and constructive narrative feedback and an action plan to improve registrars' future performance. CONTRIBUTION: Supervisory feedback in postgraduate family medicine training needs overall improvement to develop skilled family physicians.
Keywords : decentralised training; family physician; feedback; individualised learning plan; learning portfolio; postgraduate supervision; mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise.