Resumen

BENNETT, Rod; MARCUS, Tessa S.; ABBOTT, Geoff  y  HUGO, Jannie F.. Scaling community-based services in Gauteng, South Africa: A comparison of three workforce-planning scenarios. Afr. j. prim. health care fam. med. (Online) [online]. 2018, vol.10, n.1, pp.1-7. ISSN 2071-2936.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1748.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of community-based services through community health workers is an opportunity to redefine the approach and practice of primary health care. Based on best-practice community oriented primary care (COPC), a COPC planning toolkit has been developed to model the creation of a community-based tier in an integrated district health system. AIM: The article describes the methodologies and assumptions used to determine workforce numbers and service costs for three scenarios and applies them to the poorest 60% of the population in Gauteng, South Africa. SETTING: The study derives from a Gauteng Department of Health, Family Medicine (University of Pretoria) partnership to support information and communication technology (ICT)-enabled COPC through community-based health teams (termed as ward-based outreach teams. METHODS: The modelling uses national census age, gender and income data at small area level, provincial facility and national burden of disease data. Service calculations take into account multidimensional poverty, demand-adjusted burden of disease and available work time adjusted for conditions of employment and geography. RESULTS: Assuming the use of ICT for each, a health workforce of 14 819, 17 925 and 7303 is required per scenario (current practice, national norms and full-time employed COPC), respectively. Total service costs for the respective scenarios range from R1.1 billion, through R947 million to R783 million. CONCLUSION: Modelling shows that delivering ICT-enabled COPC with full-time employees is the optimal scenario. It requires the smallest workforce, is the most economical, even when individual community health worker costs of employment are twice those of current practice, and is systemically the most effective.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )