SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.50 número1All eyes on Sudan: The journey of female psychologists in the theatre of operationAn investigation of gender-based differences in assessment instruments: A test of measurement invariance índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


SA Journal of Industrial Psychology

versión On-line ISSN 2071-0763
versión impresa ISSN 0258-5200

Resumen

DU BUISSON-NARSAI, Ingra; FISHER, Talia; MORRIS, Andrew  y  VAN LILL, Xander. Neuromyths in Industrial and Organisational Psychology in South Africa: Prevalence and impact. SA j. ind. Psychol. [online]. 2024, vol.50, n.1, pp.1-6. ISSN 2071-0763.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v50i0.2097.

ORIENTATION: Industrial Psychologists (IPs) could significantly benefit from integrating neuroscientific evidence into their practices, provided they critically engage with scholarly research rather than rely on unsupported assertions. RESEARCH PURPOSE: The study aimed to assess the prevalence of neuroscientific misconceptions among IPs, student psychologists, and intern psychologists in South Africa as well as advocate for enhanced foundational knowledge in applied organisational neuroscience within industrial psychology. MOTIVATION FOR THE STUDY: The emerging field of organisational neuroscience, which applies brain science to workplace behaviour, is particularly vulnerable to misconceptions that could hinder its development. RESEARCH APPROACH/DESIGN AND METHOD: Using a cross-sectional survey, this research evaluated the knowledge of neuro misconceptions at one point in time within a convenience sample of (n = 98), consisting of registered student psychologists (n = 7; 7%), intern psychologists (n = 8; 10%), and IPs (n = 83; 85%). MAIN FINDINGS: Results indicated that this sample endorses many neuromyth conceptions. There was significant disparity in the endorsement of misconceptions between those with and without neuroscientific training, highlighting a knowledge gap. PRACTICAL/MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS: These findings underscore the necessity for improved education in applied organisational neuroscience among IOPs, suggesting integration into training and education programs. CONTRIBUTION/VALUE-ADD: This pioneering study in South Africa emphasises the role of general knowledge, specific training in applied organisational neuroscience, and critical thinking in psychological research as key to combating neuromyths, marking a meaningful contribution to the field.

Palabras clave : organisational neuroscience; neuromyths; applied neuroscience; neuroeducation; organisational psychology.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons