SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.43 issue1The contribution of work characteristics and risk propensity in explaining pro-social rule breaking among teachers in Wakiso District, UgandaOperational Forces soldiers' perceptions of attributes and skills for career success author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


SA Journal of Industrial Psychology

On-line version ISSN 2071-0763
Print version ISSN 0258-5200

Abstract

OLIVIER, Benjamin H.. The use of mixed-methods research to diagnose the organisational performance of a local government. SA j. ind. Psychol. [online]. 2017, vol.43, n.1, pp.1-14. ISSN 2071-0763.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v43i0.1453.

ORIENTATION: The majority of local governments in South Africa are underperforming; a first step to improve their performance is to accurately diagnose their current functioning. The utilisation of a mixed-methods approach for this diagnosis based on a valid model of organisational performance will form a better and holistic understanding of how a local government is performing. RESEARCH PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate the utility of mixed-methods research as a diagnostic approach for determining the organisational performance of a local government in South Africa. MOTIVATION FOR THE STUDY: The use of either quantitative or qualitative data gathering in isolation as part of an organisational diagnosis can lead to biased information and not identifying the root causes of problems. The use of mixed-methods research in which both quantitative and qualitative data gathering methods are utilised has been shown to produce numerous benefits, such as confirmation of gathered data, providing richer detail and initiating new lines of thinking. Such multiple methodologies are recognised as an essential component of any organisational diagnosis and can be an effective means of eliminating biases in singular data gathering methods. RESEARCH DESIGN, APPROACH AND METHOD: A concurrent transformative mixed-methods strategy based on the Burke-Litwin model of organisational performance with triangulation of results and findings to determine convergence validity was used. A convenience sample of 116 (N = 203) permanent officials in a rural district municipality in South Africa completed a survey questionnaire and were also individually interviewed. MAIN FINDINGS: Results indicate that mixed-methods research is a valid technique for establishing the integrity of survey data and for providing a better and holistic understanding of the functioning of an organisation. The results also indicate that the Burke-Litwin model is a useful and valid diagnostic framework for identifying the strengths and development areas of an organisation's performance. Finally, the results established the reliability and validity of the survey instrument used for gathering data PRACTICAL AND MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS: A mixed-methods research approach is a useful method to diagnose organisations' performance to ensure data integrity and to obtain a comprehensive picture of an organisation's performance. A further practical implication is that managers and practitioners can use the Burke-Litwin model as a basis for diagnosing the performance of an organisation with confidence, as it identifies the most important aspects of an organisation's functioning. CONTRIBUTION AND VALUE ADD: Organisational diagnoses are usually conducted by either quantitative or qualitative means, while the use of mixed-methods research is a relatively underutilised approach. This study aims to contribute to the availability of research approaches for diagnosing the performance of organisations.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License