SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.35 número1The psychometrical properties of translated versions of the Maslach Burnout Inventory - General SurveyPsychological empowerment of employees in selected organisations in South Africa índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


SA Journal of Industrial Psychology

versión On-line ISSN 0258-5200

Resumen

THERON, Callie. The diversity-validity dilemma: in search of minimum adverse impact and maximum utility. SA j. ind. Psychol. [online]. 2009, vol.35, n.1, pp. 183-195. ISSN 0258-5200.

Selection from diverse groups of applicants poses the formidable challenge of developing valid selection procedures that simultaneously add value, do not discriminate unfairly and which minimise adverse impact. Valid selection procedures used in a fair, non-discriminatory manner that optimises utility, however, very often result in adverse impact against members of protected groups. More often than not, the assessment techniques used for selection are blamed for this. The conventional interpretation of adverse impact results in an erroneous diagnosis of the fundamental causes of the under-representation of protected group members and, consequently, in an inappropriate treatment of the problem.

Palabras clave : personnel selection; adverse impact; unfair discrimination; employment equity; diversity.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License