SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.35 issue1The psychometrical properties of translated versions of the Maslach Burnout Inventory - General SurveyPsychological empowerment of employees in selected organisations in South Africa author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

    Related links

    • On index processCited by Google
    • On index processSimilars in Google

    Bookmark

    SA Journal of Industrial Psychology

    Print version ISSN 2071-0763

    Abstract

    THERON, Callie. The diversity-validity dilemma: in search of minimum adverse impact and maximum utility. SA j. ind. Psychol. [online]. 2009, vol.35, n.1, pp. 183-195. ISSN 2071-0763.

    Selection from diverse groups of applicants poses the formidable challenge of developing valid selection procedures that simultaneously add value, do not discriminate unfairly and which minimise adverse impact. Valid selection procedures used in a fair, non-discriminatory manner that optimises utility, however, very often result in adverse impact against members of protected groups. More often than not, the assessment techniques used for selection are blamed for this. The conventional interpretation of adverse impact results in an erroneous diagnosis of the fundamental causes of the under-representation of protected group members and, consequently, in an inappropriate treatment of the problem.

    Keywords : personnel selection; adverse impact; unfair discrimination; employment equity; diversity.

            · text in English     · pdf in English