Abstract

VAN STADEN, Martin. Constitutional rights and their limitations: A critical appraisal of the COVID-19 lockdown in South Africa. Afr. hum. rights law j. [online]. 2020, vol.20, n.2, pp.484-511. ISSN 1996-2096.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2020/v20n2a6.

The purpose of the rule of law, entrenched as supreme in section 1(c) of the South African Constitution, is to guard against tyranny. If the rule of law is conceptualised as a meta-legal doctrine that is meant to permeate all law in the promotion of certainty, predictability and accessibility, in the interests of safeguarding constitutional rights, this makes sense. Yet, the COVID-19 pandemic has seen the reach of state power expand at the expense of these rights. South Africa's COVID-19 lockdown, and within at least its first five months carrying the endorsement of the courts, has made a mockery of the rule of law so conceived. This article considers the constitutionality of South Africa's COVID-19 lockdown against the backdrop of the constitutional rights limitation regime within the broader theoretical framework of constitutionalism and the rule of law. This analysis is conducted in the context of some early challenges brought against the lockdown in four High Court cases. The article concludes that the South African government, with the partial endorsement of the courts, has strayed beyond the bounds of the Constitution and engaged in unjustified violations of constitutional rights.

Keywords : freedom; constitutionalism; constitutional rights; limitation of rights; rule of law; COVID-19; pandemic; state of disaster.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )