SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19 número1You may not refuse a blood transfusion if you are a Nigerian child: A comment on Esanubor v Faweya índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


African Human Rights Law Journal

versión On-line ISSN 1996-2096
versión impresa ISSN 1609-073X

Resumen

BOTHA, Louis  y  KOK, Anton. An empirical study of the early cases in the pilot equality courts established in terms of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000. Afr. hum. rights law j. [online]. 2019, vol.19, n.1, pp.317-336. ISSN 1996-2096.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2019/v19n1a15.

In this article the authors consider the early complaints lodged at the pilot equality courts. Since theirinception the equality courts have been underutilised. These early complaints are considered against three themes relating to effective legislation: (1) the legislature must be realistic; (2) different groups of people will be influenced in different ways by a new law; and (3) Parliament should see to it that its laws are popularised. In conclusion the authors offer recommendations on how the utilisation of the equality courts may be improved, among others that equality court personnel should be adequately trained; one forum should be created where any discrimination-related complaint may be lodged; plain language promotional materials should be developed; the parts of the Act that relate to the promotion of equality must come into force; and the workings of the equality courts should be included in the Life Orientation curriculum in schools.

Palabras clave : Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act; equality courts; effective legislation; societal transformation.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons