SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número69Admission of guilt fine: A legal shortcut with delayed shock?Interview with Shaun Shelly, Researcher at the University of Pretoria and the Policy, Advocacy and Human Rights lead at TB HIV Care, South Africa índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


SA Crime Quarterly

versión On-line ISSN 2413-3108
versión impresa ISSN 1991-3877

Resumen

OSMAN, Fatima. The omission of the opt-out clause – The revised (and improved?) Traditional Courts Bill 2017. SA crime q. [online]. 2020, n.69, pp.69-79. ISSN 2413-3108.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2413-3108/2020/i69a7821.

The Traditional Courts Bill B1B-2017 omits the opt-out clause and the notion that engagement with traditional courts is on a voluntary and consensual basis - a long-standing sticky point with traditional leaders. Under the Bill, individuals are bound to attend a traditional court when summoned and cannot opt-out of the system, which conflicts starkly with the notion of customary law as a voluntary and consensual system of law. This article argues that compelling individuals to attend a traditional court may be unconstitutional for unjustifiably infringing the rights to culture, a fair trial and equality.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons