SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue69The criminalisation of gang activity in South Africa: Re-assessing the rationaleAdmission of guilt fine: A legal shortcut with delayed shock? author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


SA Crime Quarterly

On-line version ISSN 2413-3108
Print version ISSN 1991-3877

Abstract

SWEMMER, Sheena. Justice Denied? Prosecutors and presiding officers' reliance on evidence of previous sexual history in South African rape trials. SA crime q. [online]. 2020, n.69, pp.45-56. ISSN 2413-3108.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2413-3108/2020/v0n69a6380.

This article presents data from a study conducted by the Medical Research Council of South Africa, focusing on rape attrition in South Africa at different stages in the processes (from reporting at a police station to potential conviction). The study found that of the 3 952 reported cases of rape analysed 65% were referred to prosecution, and trials commenced in 18,5% of cases. Of the total 3 952 cases reported, 8,6% resulted in a guilty verdict. Using qualitative data from a subset of trial transcripts, the article focuses specifically on the problematic views of both presiding officers and prosecutors based on rape myths and gender-stereotyping at trial, and suggests that these are a factor affecting the attrition rate between cases referred to trial and those that result in a not guilty verdict.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License