SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue66Possibly unconstitutional? The insistence on verification of address in bail hearings author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


SA Crime Quarterly

On-line version ISSN 2413-3108
Print version ISSN 1991-3877

Abstract

MASIANGOAKO, Thato. Rationalising injustice. The reinforcement of legal hegemony in South Africa. SA crime q. [online]. 2018, n.66, pp.7-17. ISSN 2413-3108.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2413-3108/2018/v0n66a5633.

The legal system in South Africa holds a legitimate and authoritative position in the country's constitutional democracy and political order, despite the commonplace experiences of injustice that take place at the hands of the criminal justice system. This article looks at how the legal consciousness of community activists, student activists and migrants is shaped by experiences of arrest and detention, and focuses particularly on how their perceptions of the law reinforce the legitimacy and hegemonic status enjoyed by the criminal justice system and broader legal system in South Africa. The article draws on original interviews with community activists, student activists and migrants, who recounted their experiences of arrest and detention. Using a socio-legal framework of legal consciousness, the article unpacks how these groups reinforce legal hegemony through the ways in which they understand and rationalise their experiences of punishment. Despite the reasonable expectation that those who have experienced a miscarriage of justice would be most sceptical and pessimistic about the law's legitimacy, this article finds that they continue to maintain their faith in the law. The article presents an analysis of interviews conducted with members of these groups, and shares evidence that begins to explore some of the ways in which South Africa's criminal justice system is able to sustain its legitimacy, despite the gaps between what the law ought to be and what the law actually is.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License