SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.47 issue2Optimizing water and resource recovery facilities (WRRF) for energy generation without compromising effluent qualityCan CHIRPS fill the gap left by the decline in the availability of rainfall stations in Southern Africa? author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Water SA

On-line version ISSN 1816-7950
Print version ISSN 0378-4738

Abstract

MUNGONDORI, Henry Heroe; MUCHINGAMI, Tariro Annah; TAZIWA, Raymond Tichawona  and  CHAUKURA, Nhamo. Performance intensification of the coagulation process in drinking water treatment. Water SA [online]. 2021, vol.47, n.2, pp.154-161. ISSN 1816-7950.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/wsa/2021.v47.i2.10911.

Surface water pollution has increased, owing to industrial development and population growth. Consequently, it is important to find alternative drinking water treatment strategies, which cater for changes in the quality of raw water. This study compared the efficiency of different coagulants in treating raw water that feeds a drinking water treatment plant (WTP). Using jar testing equipment and a number of physicochemical parameters, an investigation was conducted to establish optimum conditions for aluminium chloride (A), ferric chloride (B), and chitosan (C), and their performance compared with aluminium sulphate (D), which is the coagulant used at the WTP. The turbidity removal efficiencies for the single coagulants were in the order: B (95.7%) > A (94.7%) > C (94.4%), at optimum coagulant doses of 60, 50, and 0.6 mg/L, respectively. The coagulants achieved high removal efficiencies for turbidity, total dissolved solids (TDS), ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm (UV254) and conductivity under acidic conditions. For dual coagulants, there was a gradual increase in the removal efficiencies of the tested parameters with increasing pH. Combined coagulants were more effective compared to single coagulants, with highest removal efficiencies being exhibited by the A/C combination. Overall, the coagulants proved to be suitable alternatives to D, since they had comparable performances.

Keywords : chitosan; coagulation; ferric chloride; raw water; water pollution.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License