SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.44 issue1Modelling the economic tradeoffs between allocating water for crop production or leaching for salinity managementGenerating high-resolution digital elevation models for wetland research using Google EarthTM imagery: an example from South Africa author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Water SA

On-line version ISSN 1816-7950
Print version ISSN 0378-4738

Abstract

BRINK, IC  and  KAMISH, W. Associations between stormwater retention pond parameters and pollutant (suspended solids and metals) removal efficiencies. Water SA [online]. 2018, vol.44, n.1, pp.45-53. ISSN 1816-7950.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v44i1.06.

Presented in this paper are the results of correlational analyses and logistic regression between metal substances (Cd, Cu, Pb, Zn), as well as suspended solids removal, and physical pond parameters of 19 stormwater retention pond case studies obtained from the International Stormwater BMP database. Included are cross-correlations between metals and solids in pond influent, effluent and removals. The findings provide insights fundamental to further development of improved models and design guidelines for stormwater ponds. Indications were that (i) pond efficiencies differed between high and low influent concentrations and masses, (ii) concentration was an invalid indicator of correlations between substances in pond influent and effluent as well as the fractions of substances removed within ponds, (iii) total cadmium, copper, lead, zinc and total suspended solids (TSS) were associated in surface runoff and similarly removed within ponds, (iv) statistically significant correlations were often only found in data groups either above or below a specific statistic (quartile value, median) for specific pond parameters, indicating that removals may have been differently influenced by pond parameters over different data ranges, and (v) the volume within the permanent pool was of greater importance to pond efficiencies than the volume captured during storm events.

Keywords : stormwater; pond efficiency; detention pond; retention pond; effluent probability method; mass; concentration.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License