SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 número1Bhuiyan Md JH and Jensen D (eds) Law and Religion in the Liberal State (Hart Publishing 2020) ISBN 978 1 50992 633 6 (cased); 978 1 50992 635 0 (eBook); ePub 978 1 50992 634 3 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal (PELJ)

versión On-line ISSN 1727-3781

Resumen

ROBINSON, JA. Chief Justice Coke: Common Law v Royal Absolutism. PER [online]. 2023, vol.26, n.1, pp.1-24. ISSN 1727-3781.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a15647.

This contribution considers the character of Chief Justice Coke and his contribution to the development of English law. More specifically the focus falls on his profound knowledge of the common law and the concomitant emphasis he placed on human freedom. Coke's reliance on the common law was the cause of continuous conflict between himself and King James 1, and later also King Charles 1. True to the Royal approach in this era they strongly endorsed royal absolutism, believing it stemmed from a divine origin. James 1 enjoyed the support of Sir Francis Bacon. Intense rivalry of a personal nature existed between him and Coke too. In response to James 1 and Bacon's continuing attacks on his views, Coke could only turn to the common law.

Palabras clave : Royal prerogative; common law; parliamentary sovereignty; reason; Dr Bonham's case; Sir Edward Coke; King James 1; Sir Francis Bacon; Magna Charta.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons