SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 issue1Bhuiyan Md JH and Jensen D (eds) Law and Religion in the Liberal State (Hart Publishing 2020) ISBN 978 1 50992 633 6 (cased); 978 1 50992 635 0 (eBook); ePub 978 1 50992 634 3 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal (PELJ)

On-line version ISSN 1727-3781

Abstract

ROBINSON, JA. Chief Justice Coke: Common Law v Royal Absolutism. PER [online]. 2023, vol.26, n.1, pp.1-24. ISSN 1727-3781.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a15647.

This contribution considers the character of Chief Justice Coke and his contribution to the development of English law. More specifically the focus falls on his profound knowledge of the common law and the concomitant emphasis he placed on human freedom. Coke's reliance on the common law was the cause of continuous conflict between himself and King James 1, and later also King Charles 1. True to the Royal approach in this era they strongly endorsed royal absolutism, believing it stemmed from a divine origin. James 1 enjoyed the support of Sir Francis Bacon. Intense rivalry of a personal nature existed between him and Coke too. In response to James 1 and Bacon's continuing attacks on his views, Coke could only turn to the common law.

Keywords : Royal prerogative; common law; parliamentary sovereignty; reason; Dr Bonham's case; Sir Edward Coke; King James 1; Sir Francis Bacon; Magna Charta.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License