Abstract

GELDENHUYS, J  and  KELLY-LOUW, M. Demystifying Hate Speech under the PEPUDA. PER [online]. 2020, vol.23, n.1, pp.1-50. ISSN 1727-3781.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2020/v23i0a7520.

The factual matrix that is considered in each hate speech case differs from that in the next. However, certain factors always remain key in the process of balancing the different constitutional rights at play: who the victim is, who the perpetrator is and the nature of the expression. Additional factors to be considered in deciding whether an expression constitutes hate speech include: historical associations; who the utterer is as against the victim(s); the audience that is addressed and where the utterance is made; and the prevailing social conditions. How South African courts and the South African Human Rights Commission factor in these specific issues in assessing whether an utterance constitutes hate speech is examined in this contribution. Applicable international law principles and comparable foreign law reveal certain areas of the South African hate speech protection requiring refinement.

Keywords : Equality Court; freedom of speech; hate speech; factors to assess hate speech; South African Human Rights Commission.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )